2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse events associated with EUS and EUS-guided procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(168 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recommendations and findings of that study are similar to our own, where the majority needed 2 or 3 passes overall. Our rate of adverse events was low, in accordance with the literature and the standard guidelines [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The recommendations and findings of that study are similar to our own, where the majority needed 2 or 3 passes overall. Our rate of adverse events was low, in accordance with the literature and the standard guidelines [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…ASGE recently looked at AEs associated with routine EUS, with or without FNA/FNB [100]. Luminal perforation was relatively rare and was associated with trainee involvement, operator inexperience, advanced patient age, history of difficult esophageal intubation, presence of esophageal malignancy, or cervical spine osteophytes.…”
Section: Recommendation 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of any adverse event was documented and adverse events were classified by type (bleeding, perforation, infection, pancreatitis, anesthesia-associated cardiopulmonary event, other-specified). Definitions and grading of adverse event severity were adapted from the EUS-specific American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy adverse event consensus publication (11).…”
Section: Adverse Event Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%