2022
DOI: 10.17945/kjbt.2022.33.3.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse Events Associated with the Use of Leukocyte Reduction Filters and Blood Transfusion Sets: Experience of a Single Institute in Korea and Status of Adverse Event Reporting in Korea and the United States

Abstract: Background: Leukocyte reduction filters (LRF) and blood transfusion sets (BTS) are frequently used medical devices to prevent blood transfusion-related adverse reactions. This study attempted to analyze these medical devices related adverse events reported by an institution for 10 years and to understand the status of such reports in Korea and the United States (U.S.). Methods: From January 2013 to October 2022, adverse events reported at Soonchunhyang university Bucheon hospital (SCHBC) were analyzed. From 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, regulatory agencies rely primarily on passive surveillance systems to detect the presence of AEs and ARs, a common example being surveillance systems to monitor potential adverse effects of vaccines [12,13]. This model has also been used for other healthcare-related purposes, such as monitoring the safety of point-of-care products, new healthcare products and dengue prevention [14][15][16]. However, the success of these systems is largely dependent on spontaneous reporting by both patients and healthcare professionals, the individual's discretion in recognizing when an AE should be recorded, and their ability to submit a thorough report for assessment [17,18].…”
Section: Current Methods To Detect Aes and Arsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, regulatory agencies rely primarily on passive surveillance systems to detect the presence of AEs and ARs, a common example being surveillance systems to monitor potential adverse effects of vaccines [12,13]. This model has also been used for other healthcare-related purposes, such as monitoring the safety of point-of-care products, new healthcare products and dengue prevention [14][15][16]. However, the success of these systems is largely dependent on spontaneous reporting by both patients and healthcare professionals, the individual's discretion in recognizing when an AE should be recorded, and their ability to submit a thorough report for assessment [17,18].…”
Section: Current Methods To Detect Aes and Arsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The product codes for the POC glucometers used in Korea and the United States were obtained from the blood glucose test system and NBW (System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over The Counter), respectively. Collected AEs were classified using International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) codes for medical device problems (Annex A) and clinical signs and symptoms or conditions (Annex E) [ 9 , 10 ]. This study did not require Institutional Review Board approval, because it did not involve human subjects, including any interaction or intervention with human subjects, or access to identifiable private information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%