2012
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse ophthalmic reaction in poppers users: case series of ‘poppers maculopathy’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
60
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our study shows that vitelliform-like lesions tend to occur amongst chronic users and that a significant proportion of them had not improved over time despite drug cessation. The effect of prolonged poppers consumption has already been highlighted in several studies but the conclusions on the visual prognosis are contradictory [3,4,5]. Our study brings further confirmation that chronic use may be associated with more severe and permanent photoreceptor damage.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, our study shows that vitelliform-like lesions tend to occur amongst chronic users and that a significant proportion of them had not improved over time despite drug cessation. The effect of prolonged poppers consumption has already been highlighted in several studies but the conclusions on the visual prognosis are contradictory [3,4,5]. Our study brings further confirmation that chronic use may be associated with more severe and permanent photoreceptor damage.…”
supporting
confidence: 77%
“…In both 'poppers maculopathy' and photic maculopathy, there is focal disruption of the IS-OS junction centred at the fovea. [1][2][3][4] Moreover, the size, shape, echogenicity, and temporal evolution of the SD-OCT lesions appear indistinguishable in the two conditions. Patients also present with the same symptoms (scotoma, reduced vision, and phosphenes) and have the same slit-lamp findings (a pale yellow foveal lesion).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients also present with the same symptoms (scotoma, reduced vision, and phosphenes) and have the same slit-lamp findings (a pale yellow foveal lesion). [1][2][3][4] Indeed, it appears that in people using poppers, the two conditions can only be reliably distinguished by eliciting a history of excess light exposure and not by clinical features.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We thank Dr Fajgenbaum 1 for his interest in our recent case series of maculopathy in poppers users 2 and for debate on this matter with respect to photic maculopathy.…”
Section: Response To Fajgenbaummentioning
confidence: 99%