Adverse Reactions and Interactions with β-Adrenoceptor Blocking Drugs

Abstract

beta-Blocking drugs are widely used throughout the world and serious adverse reactions are relatively uncommon. Most of those which do occur are pharmacologically predictable and may be avoided by ensuring that patients who are to be given beta-blockers do not have a predisposition to the development of bronchospasm, cardiac failure or peripheral ischaemia. In some situations, the use of a beta 1-selective blocking drug may reduce the risk of a severe adverse reaction, but there is little evidence that other ancillary properties such as partial agonist activity are of relevance in this context. Long term experience with many of the beta-blockers in current use suggests that unpredictable major adverse reactions such as the practolol oculomucocutaneous syndrome are unlikely to be repeated, although some of these drugs may be associated with immunological disturbances and some have been implicated in the development of retroperitoneal fibrosis. beta-Blocking drugs appear to be associated with a number of subjective side effects including muscle fatigue, peripheral coldness and some neurological symptoms. These side effects are highly subjective and are therefore difficult to quantify and it is not known whether they are of major importance in terms of their effect upon patients' overall well-being. It cannot be assumed that simply because such side effects can be elicited that they do, in fact, matter. However, because beta-blockers are often prescribed for patients who have no symptoms and for whom the benefits of therapy are generally small, such side effects would be of considerable importance if they had an overall effect upon quality of life. There are theoretical reasons to suppose that the incidence and severity of such side effects may be related to the ancillary properties of the individual drugs, but there is little evidence that parameters such as beta 1-selectivity, or partial agonist activity are clinically important determinants of the severity of these side effects. Lipophilicity, however, may be associated with an increased incidence of neurological symptoms. beta-Blocking drugs may cause a variety of metabolic disturbances including an increase in serum VLDL-cholesterol concentrations. However, long term studies have not shown that such disturbances are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, indicating that such metabolic changes may not be of major importance in practice. beta-Blocking drugs may be involved in a number of interactions with other drugs, but few of these have been shown to be of clinical significance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Natriuretic Peptide-Induced Catecholamine Release from Cardiac Sympathetic Neurons: Inhibition by Histamine H3 and H4 Receptor Activation

“…Accordingly, preserving and/or stimulating PDE3 function via H 3 and H 4 receptor activation could offer a useful new approach to the treatment of cardiac dysfunctions with natriuretic peptides. Indeed, although ␤-adrenoceptor blockade has been advocated to prevent the deleterious effects of chronic BNP exposure in congestive heart failure (Thireau et al, 2012), stimulation of PDE3 activity via H 3 and H 4 receptor activation might be preferable, given the notorious adverse effects of ␤-blockers (Lewis and McDevitt, 1986). …”

The Pharmacokinetics of Lignocaine and β-Adrenoceptor Antagonists in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

“…Adverse effects of {3-adrenoceptor blockade are usually associated with disease states that are sensitive to reductions in the effect of background sympathetic tone (Lewis & McDevitt 1986). In such cases, the receptor blockade resulting from even low doses (e.g.…”

A Systematic Review on the Cost-Effectiveness of Genetic and Electrocardiogram Testing for Long QT Syndrome in Infants and Young Adults

“…All the studies observed a medium score for data collection, with one study [5] scoring higher owing to a more detailed reporting of patients' characteristics included in the analysis. Finally, the section "Analysis and Interpretation of Results" provides details on time horizon, discount rates (items [22][23][24][25], statistical tests, confidence intervals, sensitivity analysis, alternatives compared, and major outcomes reporting and caveats (items [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. All the studies achieved a medium to high score for analysis and interpretation of results.…”