2014
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advertisements of follow-on formula and their perception by pregnant women and mothers in Italy

Abstract: Objective To assess how follow-on formula milks for infants aged 6-12 months are presented to and understood by mothers. Design A quantitative and qualitative cross-sectional study including (1) an analysis of advertisements in three magazines for parents; (2) in-depth semistructured qualitative interviews to pregnant women on their perception of two advertisements for follow-on formula and (3) self-administered questionnaires for mothers to explore their exposure to and perception of formula advertisements. P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pervasive promotions for growing‐up milks found by this study is also troubling because previous research has shown that mothers and caregivers often cannot differentiate between the different stages of BMS products (Berry, Jones, & Iverson, ; Cattaneo et al, ) and caregivers confused by similar packaging could inappropriately use growing‐up milks to feed younger infants. Pereira et al () documented BMS manufacturers using the same brand attributes across their range of products in four study sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pervasive promotions for growing‐up milks found by this study is also troubling because previous research has shown that mothers and caregivers often cannot differentiate between the different stages of BMS products (Berry, Jones, & Iverson, ; Cattaneo et al, ) and caregivers confused by similar packaging could inappropriately use growing‐up milks to feed younger infants. Pereira et al () documented BMS manufacturers using the same brand attributes across their range of products in four study sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…mothers and caregivers often cannot differentiate between the different stages of BMS products (Berry, Jones, & Iverson, 2010;Cattaneo et al, 2015) and caregivers confused by similar packaging could inappropriately use growing-up milks to feed younger infants. Pereira et al CPCF products were found in nearly every store surveyed, indicating the ubiquity of commercially available complementary foods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the advertising of toddler formulas has become increasingly prevalent [22] since Australia became a signatory to the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes (WHA 34.22 1981) which prohibits the advertising of infant formulas. With both products sharing common visual packaging elements such as colour, shape, typeface and logo, toddler milk advertisements appear to function as de facto infant formula advertisements with most women not being able distinguish between toddler and infant formulas and referring to both as ‘formula’ [23,24]. While most toddlers in this study were still consuming ‘infant’ versions of formula the advertising of toddler formula may have promulgated the perception amongst mothers that formulas of any kind are beneficial to the health of toddlers and are essential to meet the needs of developing toddlers that cannot be met by cow’s milk and family foods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sales growth in these categories may reflect a market segmentation strategy whereby TMFC are exploiting the erroneous perception that breast-feeding applies to the first 6 months only, and not to continued breastfeeding (53) . The branding, packaging and labelling of follow-up formula and toddler formula products frequently resembles and is commonly mistaken for infant formula (16,18,45) . This can circumvent MF regulations focused exclusively on the 0-6 month age bracket and may be exacerbated when IYCF policies and programmes emphasize exclusive breast-feeding only, and not ongoing breast-feeding (54) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sales boom applies not only to infant formula (for consumption by infants aged 0-6 months) but also to follow-up (7-12 months) and toddler (13-36 months) formulas, which can displace ongoing breast-feeding if marketed and consumed inappropriately. Because products in these latter categories are often branded, packaged and labelled in ways that resemble infant formula, they can be erroneously introduced in the first 6 months of life (16)(17)(18) . The WHO has long maintained that these milks are unnecessary and unsuitable as BMS (19) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%