2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1956352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advocacy 2.0: An Analysis of How Advocacy Groups in the United States Perceive and Use Social Media as Tools for Facilitating Civic Engagement and Collective Action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this survey of 157 participants from 63 advocacy groups operating in Canada suggest four conclusions: 1) most of the Canadian advocacy groups surveyed are adopting a limited selection of social media technologies, mainly Facebook, Twitter, Obar Canadian Advocacy 2.0 blogs, and YouTube, 2) these same groups perceive social media as offering a variety of beneficial affordances, 3) many groups have reservations about overcommitting to the technology, and 4) when the results of this study are compared with Obar et al (2012), the Canadian groups appear more cautious in their adoption of social media strategy than their American counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of this survey of 157 participants from 63 advocacy groups operating in Canada suggest four conclusions: 1) most of the Canadian advocacy groups surveyed are adopting a limited selection of social media technologies, mainly Facebook, Twitter, Obar Canadian Advocacy 2.0 blogs, and YouTube, 2) these same groups perceive social media as offering a variety of beneficial affordances, 3) many groups have reservations about overcommitting to the technology, and 4) when the results of this study are compared with Obar et al (2012), the Canadian groups appear more cautious in their adoption of social media strategy than their American counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The tasks were adapted from (Obar et al, 2012), and also draw from several "advocacy tactics" noted by Guo and Saxton (2010): grassroots lobbying; public events and direct action; public education; and coalition building.…”
Section: The Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, disabled people have found social networking platforms to be liberating in the absence of physical and visual barriers experienced in other public venues (Guo, Briscout, and Huang 2005;Seymour and Lupton 2004). However, the idea that online engagement actually produces positive "offline" outcomes in terms of activism, civic engagement, or political engagement, in any age bracket, is still being debated in the academic literature (Bennett, Wells, and Freelon 2011;Christiansen 2011;Conroy, Feezell, and Guerrero 2012;Obar, Zube, and Lampe 2012;Olorunnisola and Martin 2013). There appears, however, to be a correlation between online political engagement and offline political engagement among adults, thus countering the assumption that online political activity replaces offline political activity.…”
Section: Social Media: Inclusive Tools For Change?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] With Facebook alone, recently reporting nearly 1.2 billion active monthly users and 728 million active daily users, 4 it becomes important to study and understand the implications of the global reach and influence of social networking technologies. Social networking platforms allow users to communicate globally and learn from people from various cultures, religious ideologies, and political affiliations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%