1999
DOI: 10.1006/bcon.1999.0758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerial Application of the Viral Enhancer Blankophor BBH with Reduced Rates of Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) Nucleopolyhedrovirus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the concentration of optical brightener used in virus + brightener mixtures was identified as significantly affecting the degree of potentiation of homologous nucleopolyhedroviruses. This confirms the results of specific tests in second instar P. includens and L. dispar , in which a positive relationship between brightener concentration and the magnitude of viral synergism was evident (Zou & Young, 1996; Shapiro & Argauer, 1997; Thorpe et al., 1999). This probably reflects a simple dose effect, the quantity of optical brightener consumed exerting a greater effect on peritrophic membrane permeability and gut cell turnover at high concentrations, and a comparatively reduced biological effect at low concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…By contrast, the concentration of optical brightener used in virus + brightener mixtures was identified as significantly affecting the degree of potentiation of homologous nucleopolyhedroviruses. This confirms the results of specific tests in second instar P. includens and L. dispar , in which a positive relationship between brightener concentration and the magnitude of viral synergism was evident (Zou & Young, 1996; Shapiro & Argauer, 1997; Thorpe et al., 1999). This probably reflects a simple dose effect, the quantity of optical brightener consumed exerting a greater effect on peritrophic membrane permeability and gut cell turnover at high concentrations, and a comparatively reduced biological effect at low concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…More generally, our experimental procedure may be useful in the further development of the virus as a management tool (Reardon et al 1996). One of the obstacles to the development and use of viral sprays is the large-scale field trials necessary to evaluate transmission efficacy of different candidate strains (Thorpe et al 1999; Reardon et al 1996). Small-scale transmission experiments might reduce the cost of these evaluations, by providing a preliminary screening of virus strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formulations showing improved UV stability in the laboratory, however, do not always show improved persistence or efficacy in crop trials 6 , 35 . For example, although the UV protectant BLANKOPHOR BBH increased baculovirus persistence in lab trials, it did not increase effectiveness in field trials 49 . The crucial test of UV formulations must remain the use of plant studies, as this alone can most adequately approximate to the on-crop situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%