2007
DOI: 10.1109/3dim.2007.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerial Lidar Data Classification using AdaBoost

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thereby, the straightforward solution consists in applying standard classifiers such as a Support Vector Machine classifier, a Random Forest classifier, a Bayesian Discriminant classifier, etc. for classifying 3D points based on the derived feature vectors (Lodha et al, 2006;Lodha et al, 2007;Mallet et al, 2011;Guo et al, 2011;Khoshelham and Oude Elberink, 2012;Weinmann et al, 2015a). Respective classifiers are available in numerous software tools and easy-to-use, but the achieved labeling typically reveals a noisy appearance since no spatial correlation between class labels of neighboring 3D points is taken into account.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereby, the straightforward solution consists in applying standard classifiers such as a Support Vector Machine classifier, a Random Forest classifier, a Bayesian Discriminant classifier, etc. for classifying 3D points based on the derived feature vectors (Lodha et al, 2006;Lodha et al, 2007;Mallet et al, 2011;Guo et al, 2011;Khoshelham and Oude Elberink, 2012;Weinmann et al, 2015a). Respective classifiers are available in numerous software tools and easy-to-use, but the achieved labeling typically reveals a noisy appearance since no spatial correlation between class labels of neighboring 3D points is taken into account.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the straightforward solution consists in selecting a standard approach for supervised classification, e.g. a Support Vector Machine classifier Lodha et al, 2006), a Random Forest classifier (Chehata et al, 2009;Guo et al, 2011;Steinsiek et al, 2017), an AdaBoost(-like) classifier (Lodha et al, 2007;Guo et al, 2015) or a Bayesian Discriminant Analysis classifier (Khoshelham and Oude Elberink, 2012). However, as these classifiers treat each point of the point cloud individually, they do not take into account a spatial regularity of the derived labeling, i.e.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work, Random-Forest (Breiman, 2001) are chosen because they are one of the most accurate general purpose classifier and have multiple advantages compared to SVM for example, with similar results (Mountrakis et al, 2011) or Gaussian Mixture Model (Lalonde et al, 2005), Markov Random Fields (Munoz et al, 2009) and Adaboost (Lodha et al, 2007).…”
Section: Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%