2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/robio.2012.6491124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerial localization of an RF source in NLOS condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two paired waypoints that are used in DRSSI calculation should be far enough apart, as it has large impact on the performance of SLUS. Although a typical AOA sensor is costly, a less costly with lower resolution AOA sensor is considered, which has shown that can be helpful in improving the SLUS accuracy and convergence ratio as it was shown for localization in our previous research (Dehghan et al, 2012;Dehghan et al, submitted for publication;Isaacs et al, 2014). The more number of RF sources available in the search area causes the more accuracy and the better convergence ratio of the SLUS approach.…”
Section: Conclusion On the Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two paired waypoints that are used in DRSSI calculation should be far enough apart, as it has large impact on the performance of SLUS. Although a typical AOA sensor is costly, a less costly with lower resolution AOA sensor is considered, which has shown that can be helpful in improving the SLUS accuracy and convergence ratio as it was shown for localization in our previous research (Dehghan et al, 2012;Dehghan et al, submitted for publication;Isaacs et al, 2014). The more number of RF sources available in the search area causes the more accuracy and the better convergence ratio of the SLUS approach.…”
Section: Conclusion On the Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kwon and Pack, 2012;Lee et al, 2009;Okello et al, 2011). The localization techniques based on received strength signal indicator (RSSI) and AOA measurements are presented in previous articles by authors assuming to have accurate UAV position (Dehghan and Moradi, 2013;Dehghan et al, 2012). To the best of our knowledge, the UAV navigation error in RF source localization has not been studied before.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signal attenuation due to the shadowing has a normal distribution when it is expressed by dB [18]. It should be noted that modeling of diffraction loss decreases the SD of shadowing relatively to the mentioned values in other papers [13,20]. Considering that the total signal loss in terms of dB has a Gaussian distribution, subtracting a determinate amount as path loss, does not change the distribution and its SD.…”
Section: 0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all of the above type of the localization approaches, the hills and mountains between an RF source and a UAV (Fig. 1), which is also called obstacles throughout this paper, have the greatest effect on the observation model and the localization accuracy [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Received Signal Strength (RSS) [1], Differential Signal Strength (DRSS) [2], Angle Of Arrival (AOA) [3], Time Of Arrival (TOA) [4], and Time Difference Of Arrival (TDOA) [5] are different measurements of the received signal which have been used to localize the RF source. And still there are efforts to improve the accuracy in different scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%