2021
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b3-2021-713-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerial Photogrammetry and Machine Learning Based Regional Landslide Susceptibility Assessment for an Earthquake Prone Area in Turkey

Abstract: Abstract. Landslide is a frequently observed natural phenomenon and a geohazard with destructive effects on economies, society and the environment. Production of up-to-date landslide susceptibility (LS) maps is an essential process for landslide hazard mitigation. Obtaining up-to-date and accurate data for the production of LS maps is also important and this task can be achieved by using aerial photogrammetric techniques, which can produce geospatial data with high resolution. The produced geospatial datasets … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be noted that in the present study, the size of the study area (2718.7 km 2 ) was relatively large, which indicates that the results are promising for regional susceptibility assessment studies. On the other hand, when the LS prediction results from recent ML studies carried out in the East and Southeast Anatolia are compared; Karakas et al [20] obtained AUC values of 0.90 and 0.92 using the RF method in an area of 425 km 2 using very high resolution aerial photogrammetric datasets [20]. Sevgen et al [15] evaluated logistic regression, ANN and RF methods in the close vicinity of a dam reservoir again by using very high resolution aerial photogrammetric datasets; and obtained AUC values of 0.76, 0.84 and 0.95, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should also be noted that in the present study, the size of the study area (2718.7 km 2 ) was relatively large, which indicates that the results are promising for regional susceptibility assessment studies. On the other hand, when the LS prediction results from recent ML studies carried out in the East and Southeast Anatolia are compared; Karakas et al [20] obtained AUC values of 0.90 and 0.92 using the RF method in an area of 425 km 2 using very high resolution aerial photogrammetric datasets [20]. Sevgen et al [15] evaluated logistic regression, ANN and RF methods in the close vicinity of a dam reservoir again by using very high resolution aerial photogrammetric datasets; and obtained AUC values of 0.76, 0.84 and 0.95, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advancements in machine learning (ML) algorithms, geospatial technologies and computational power, production of LS maps have become less challenging. Among the common ML algorithms used for the LS mapping in the literature, the artificial neural networks (ANN), logistic regression (LR), deep learning methods, decision trees, random forest (RF), naïve Bayes tree, fuzzy logic and support vector machine (SVM) can be listed (e.g., see [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]). The ML techniques can increase the accuracy of the LS maps [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 1.013.390 pixels (9 features with 11.408 landslides and 1.001.982 non-landslide pixels in each with 25 m grid spacing) were analyzed to reveal the characteristics of the landslides (Figure 2). A total of 9 features were categorized depending on the literature to assess the FR (Karakas, 2021).…”
Section: Conditioning Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production of high-quality hazard models requires complete and accurate landslide inventories. The Frequency Ratio (FR) model is widely utilized for assessing the correlations between spatial data and criteria by determining the likelihood of occurrence and non-occurrence for each category of conditioning factors (Dao et * Corresponding author al., 2020;Karakas et al, 2021;Pham et al, 2021). This analysis helps to identify the most significant factors contributing to the occurrence of the phenomenon and informs decisions related to risk management and mitigation strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is prone to landslides. The site was previously assessed for its landslide inventory (Karakas et al, 2021a) and the LSM production accuracy by using different machine learning (ML) methods (Karakas et al, 2021b(Karakas et al, , 2022. The location of the study area is illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Study Area and Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%