2022
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2022.3149094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aero-Engine Remaining Useful Life Estimation Based on Multi-Head Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C-MAPSS dataset defines the remaining useful life of a turbofan engine as the number of remaining operating cycles until a fault occurs. Current research primarily centers on predicting the remaining operating cycles of turbofan engines [6][7][8][9][34][35][36]. However, the remaining operating cycles are influenced by various external and internal factors, resulting in significant errors and a low coefficient of determination between the predicted and actual values.…”
Section: Health Index Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The C-MAPSS dataset defines the remaining useful life of a turbofan engine as the number of remaining operating cycles until a fault occurs. Current research primarily centers on predicting the remaining operating cycles of turbofan engines [6][7][8][9][34][35][36]. However, the remaining operating cycles are influenced by various external and internal factors, resulting in significant errors and a low coefficient of determination between the predicted and actual values.…”
Section: Health Index Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction model for the RUL of turbofan engines is developed based on either their physical structure model or the degradation trends among various monitoring sensors. There are two types of existing methods for estimating RUL: those based on physical models [4,5] and data-driven approaches [6][7][8][9]. Data-driven methods analyze data and identify complex data relationships, achieving accurate predictions of changes in the turbofan engine's state [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning have more powerful feature extraction and nonlinear relationship learning ability than shallow machine learning prediction methods [14]- [16], therefore, it is widely used for RUL prediction. For example, Ma et al [17] used stacked sparse autoencoder to automatically extract performance degradation features from multiple sensors on the aircraft engine, and applied logistic regression to predict the RUL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNNs can extract spatial features from raw data, in recent years there has also been research on introducing CNN to the task of aero-engine RUL prediction. For example, Ren et al [21] proposed a multi-head CNN to improve the ability of the prediction network to extract temporal features from the original data. Kim and Sohn [22] proposed a multi-task learning model based on CNN, which can reflect some implicit correlations between RUL prediction and data monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%