16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-3985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeroacoustic Characterization of T-Junctions Based on Large Eddy Simulation and System Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The configurations differ in the duct diameter d od exp ¼ 0:057 m. While Strouhal number and Mach number show similarity, the Reynolds number of the simulation is 60 percent smaller than in the experiment. Föller et al [40] argue that this discrepancy has little influence on the momentum thickness of the shear layer and that the data collapses well with Strouhal number.…”
Section: Numerical Setupmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The configurations differ in the duct diameter d od exp ¼ 0:057 m. While Strouhal number and Mach number show similarity, the Reynolds number of the simulation is 60 percent smaller than in the experiment. Föller et al [40] argue that this discrepancy has little influence on the momentum thickness of the shear layer and that the data collapses well with Strouhal number.…”
Section: Numerical Setupmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The domain Ω is discretized using the same mesh configuration which is described in detail in Föller et al [40]. Overall, 5 million hexahedral cells are used to account for the influence of numerical resolution [43].…”
Section: Large-eddy Simulation Of Flow Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Karlsson and Åbom [13] presented an experimental study in which they treated a T-junction as an active three-port, and performed measurements over a wide frequency range for three different combinations of grazing and bias flows. The three-port formulation was also used by Föller et al [14] who used LES to calculate the threeport for a case without bias flow, which compared well to the experimental data of Karlsson and Åbom [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The assessment of the acoustic scattering at an element in an unsteady flowfi eld can be performed by means of the so-called LES/SI method developed by Polifkea nd co-workers, e.g. [8,9], which combines Large Eddy Simulation (LES)a nd System Identification (SI) techniques. Hereby,anLES excited with abroadband acoustic signal is performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%