2002
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2002.5199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeroacoustics Research in Europe: The Ceas-Asc Report on 2001 Highlights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 13 compares instantaneous pressure of three cases at a nondimensional observer distance of 12 . Although case (2) has the best computational efficiency, the computation does not predict the wave diffraction at the lip correctly. The secondary radiation peak and interference dip angle expected for this problem do not appear in the prediction.…”
Section: Artificial Selective Damping and Filtersmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 13 compares instantaneous pressure of three cases at a nondimensional observer distance of 12 . Although case (2) has the best computational efficiency, the computation does not predict the wave diffraction at the lip correctly. The secondary radiation peak and interference dip angle expected for this problem do not appear in the prediction.…”
Section: Artificial Selective Damping and Filtersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The testing environment is a 1.7 GHz i5 computer with 4 GBytes memory. To arrive at far-field directivity, the computation requires 219 s with the finest uniform mesh, 42 s for case (2) and 83 s for case (3).…”
Section: Artificial Selective Damping and Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,2 Analytical techniques for predicting sound levels from this interaction have been developed. [3][4][5][6][7] However, these were based on linearized flow equations and simplified geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a reduction target of perceived noise level of 50% by 2020 [2], computational aeroacoustics (CAA) is being used with increasing frequency in studying the physics of aerodynamically generated noise. Various attempts have been made to apply CAA methods to airframe/engine noise study both in the EU countries and in the US [3,4]. The general objectives of CAA focus on the prediction of aerodynamic sound sources and the propagation of the generated sound.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%