2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.03.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeroallergen Sensitization, Serum IgE, and Eosinophilia as Predictors of Response to Omalizumab Therapy During the Fall Season Among Children with Persistent Asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
21
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
21
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For patients with BEC 150 to 1500 cells/mL and perennial allergy with a clear history of allergy-provoked asthma symptoms, anti-IgE is recommended as a possible choice in clinical practice, but not as the only treatment option, especially in patients with BEC close to 1500. 110,111 Post hoc data clearly demonstrate that anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab), anti-IL-5Ra (benralizumab), and anti-IL-4/13 (dupilumab) treatments are equally effective in patients with high IgE and low IgE. 17,112,113 There is overlap of eligibility in this group, and generally the higher the BEC, even if a perennial allergy is documented, the more likely a positive response to an anti-eosinophil agent.…”
Section: Biologic Treatment Choice Based On Predictors Of Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients with BEC 150 to 1500 cells/mL and perennial allergy with a clear history of allergy-provoked asthma symptoms, anti-IgE is recommended as a possible choice in clinical practice, but not as the only treatment option, especially in patients with BEC close to 1500. 110,111 Post hoc data clearly demonstrate that anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab), anti-IL-5Ra (benralizumab), and anti-IL-4/13 (dupilumab) treatments are equally effective in patients with high IgE and low IgE. 17,112,113 There is overlap of eligibility in this group, and generally the higher the BEC, even if a perennial allergy is documented, the more likely a positive response to an anti-eosinophil agent.…”
Section: Biologic Treatment Choice Based On Predictors Of Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] Therefore, some patients will have persistent severe AEs despite receiving adequate treatment, or in other words, exacerbation-prone asthma (EPA), 11,13 whereas type-2-high inflammation has been associated with AE, it is also more likely to show better treatment response to asthma medications, which are mostly type-2 targeted. 14,15 We can assume that risk factors of the longitudinal AE phenotype need to be investigated separately from risk factors of AE through prospective studies with controlled treatment protocols. 13 In this study, we aimed to describe the distribution of longitudinal AE phenotypes, identify EPA predictors, and examine the effect of the longitudinal clinical course on future AE in children and adolescents with asthma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent severe AE is the most important risk factor for future exacerbation, even after adjusting for demographic and clinical factors 10–12 11,13 whereas type‐2‐high inflammation has been associated with AE, it is also more likely to show better treatment response to asthma medications, which are mostly type‐2 targeted 14,15 13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В двух рандомизированных клинических исследованиях у пациентов в возрасте от 6 до 20 лет -ICATA (Inner-City Anti-IgE Therapy for Asthma) и PROSE (Preventative Omalizumab or Step-up Therapy for Severe Fall exacerbations) -было показано, что лучшим предиктором ответа на омализумаб является сенсибилизация к более чем 4 группам аллергенов. У пациентов с полисенсибилизацией омализумаб способствовал стойкому контролю симптомов БА [6]. Необходимо учитывать, что уровень эозинофилов и концентрация общего иммуноглобулина Е (IgE) не влияют на ответ пациента на анти-IgEтерапию и не должны быть использованы в качестве кри- териев отбора на терапию омализумабом [1].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified