2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.08.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerobic digestion of starch wastewater in a fluidized bed bioreactor with low density biomass support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different reactor systems are used to treat textile effluent with different characteristics: like, submerged filtration using nano-membrane (Zheng et al 2013), Upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor (UASB) coupled with adsorption process (Conceição et al 2013), fluidized bed reactor (Su et al 2011), microbial degradation (Agarry and Ajani 2011), combination of fixed and fluidized bed (Baban et al 2010), thermolysis , ultrafiltration (Dhodapkar et al 2007) and sequential anaerobic-aerobic treatments (Kapdan et al 2003)-to name a few. Different reaction criteria for COD removal have also been worked upon, like: ratio of volume of settled bed to bioreactor (Sokol 2003), use of catalyst system with thermolysis and coagulation treatment as well as solid content of influent (Rajasimman and Karthikeyan 2007). Biotreatment of textile wastewater required few potential indigenous microorganisms for biodegradation of COD (Agarry and Ajani 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different reactor systems are used to treat textile effluent with different characteristics: like, submerged filtration using nano-membrane (Zheng et al 2013), Upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor (UASB) coupled with adsorption process (Conceição et al 2013), fluidized bed reactor (Su et al 2011), microbial degradation (Agarry and Ajani 2011), combination of fixed and fluidized bed (Baban et al 2010), thermolysis , ultrafiltration (Dhodapkar et al 2007) and sequential anaerobic-aerobic treatments (Kapdan et al 2003)-to name a few. Different reaction criteria for COD removal have also been worked upon, like: ratio of volume of settled bed to bioreactor (Sokol 2003), use of catalyst system with thermolysis and coagulation treatment as well as solid content of influent (Rajasimman and Karthikeyan 2007). Biotreatment of textile wastewater required few potential indigenous microorganisms for biodegradation of COD (Agarry and Ajani 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluidized bed bioreactor is one of the most effective methods used in effluent treatment (Buffiére and Moletta 1999). Recently, industrial wastewaters have been treated by aerobic biological treatment in three-phase fluidized bed (Haribabu and Sivasubramanian 2014;Sabarunisha Begum and Radha 2014;Sokol 2012;Sokol and Woldeyes 2011;Rajasimman and Karthikeyan 2007;Ochieng et al 2003). Air stream is bubbled directly into the liquid, creating three phase in the aerobic treatment of wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In optimum conditions, the COD removal of 67% was reported. Rajasimman and Karthikeyan (2007) used a fluidized bed bioreactor with low density particles to treat high organic concentration wastewater of starch industry. At the COD of 2250 mg L -1 and the hydraulic retention time of 24 h, the optimum COD removal of 93.8% was reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three-phase (gas-liquid-solid) FBBR has been successfully applied in aerobic biological treatment of industrial and municipal wastewaters [5][6][7][8]. The reactor outperforms other reactor configurations used in wastewater treatment such as the activated sludge system and packed-bed (or trickling-filter) reactor [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%