2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2004.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic and aeroelastic amplification in adaptive belt-rib airfoils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown that the deformation shape and curvature of the morphing structure significantly affects the aerodynamic performance of the airfoils [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Sanders et al [9] conducted investigations on airfoils fitted with conventional flaps and conformal morphing trailing edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies have shown that the deformation shape and curvature of the morphing structure significantly affects the aerodynamic performance of the airfoils [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Sanders et al [9] conducted investigations on airfoils fitted with conventional flaps and conformal morphing trailing edges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that the changes to the lift coefficient are dependent on the size, curvature and deflection angle of the deformed trailing edge and strongly curved deformed trailing edge can produce lower maximum lift-to-drag ratio and also increased the root bending moment coefficient compared to a gently curved deformed trailing edge. Campanile et al [13] developed a belt-rib morphing airfoil concept and proposed a model to study the possible actuation requirement reduction by exploiting the aerodynamic and aeroelastic amplification effects on airfoils. Effects of different deformation modes of morphing airfoil and conventional airfoil using hinged flap were quantitatively evaluated and results show that higher slope at trailing edge of belt-rib airfoil leads to large change in lift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aircraft wing and wind turbine blades are usually optimized for certain operating conditions and, as such, adaptive geometry change capabilities that enable active load control and gust load alleviation could significantly enhance the overall system performance (Ai et al, 2015;Barbarino et al, 2011;Campanile et al, 2004;Lachenal et al, 2013). Morphing structures have received growing interest from the research community as well as aviation, wind energy and automobile industries (Lachenal et al, 2013;Chopra 2002;Weisshaar 2013;Barbarino et al, 2011), owing to their excellent performance, lightweight and reduced structural complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For low-speed flow, this structural model is complemented by unsteady airfoil theories (and an appropriate wake model) that provide the aerodynamic loading. However, there are situations in which the assumption of rigid cross sections cannot be justified, which can happen intentionally by design, as in the examples above [1][2][3][4][5] , or simply due to the 1 Lecturer, Department of Aeronautics, 355 Roderic Hill Building (rpalacio@imperial.ac.uk). Member AIAA 2 Associate Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, 3024 FXB Building (cesnik@umich.edu).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%