2016
DOI: 10.3390/en9020066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic and Structural Integrated Optimization Design of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine Blades

Abstract: Abstract:A procedure based on MATLAB combined with ANSYS is presented and utilized for the aerodynamic and structural integrated optimization design of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine (HAWT) blades. Three modules are used for this purpose: an aerodynamic analysis module using the Blade Element Momentum (BEM) theory, a structural analysis module employing the Finite Element Method (FEM) and a multi-objective optimization module utilizing the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. The former two provide a suffici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The airfoil locations are reflected by the percent thickness distribution, as illustrated Once the geometry shape of the blade is fixed, the aerodynamic loads can be calculated using BEM theory [20,21] by dividing the blade into several independent elements. Aerodynamic loads including operational case and ultimate case for the optimization design in this paper are the same as the loads in [19]. The operational case takes into account the maximum root flap bending moment Mflap under operational state, which is computed as follow: 2 2 4πρ (1 )…”
Section: Geometry Shape and Aerodynamic Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The airfoil locations are reflected by the percent thickness distribution, as illustrated Once the geometry shape of the blade is fixed, the aerodynamic loads can be calculated using BEM theory [20,21] by dividing the blade into several independent elements. Aerodynamic loads including operational case and ultimate case for the optimization design in this paper are the same as the loads in [19]. The operational case takes into account the maximum root flap bending moment Mflap under operational state, which is computed as follow: 2 2 4πρ (1 )…”
Section: Geometry Shape and Aerodynamic Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the constraints are: (1) geometrical shape [19]: the twist, chord and percent thickness distributions are required to monotonically decrease; (2) material layup: the number of layers shown in Figure 7 need to increase to a maximum value and then decrease, the location of layers need to monotonically increase; (3) maximum strain [25]: to meet the strength requirement, the maximum strains of GFRP ε maxG and CFRP ε maxC can not exceed the allowable values ε dG and ε dC , respectively; (4) maximum tip deflection [26]: to avoid the risk of blade and tower collision, the maximum tip deflection d max must be limited to a design value d d ; (5) natural frequency [27]: to prevent resonance, the first natural frequency of the blade F blade−1 should be separated from the integral multiple of the rotor rotation frequency F rotor ; (6) buckling load [28]: the lowest buckling eigenvalue λ 1 is required to be larger than a safety factor to avoid buckling failure.…”
Section: Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations