2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic characteristics of a long-span cable-stayed bridge under construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two ultrasonic anemometers are installed at the top of 2.5 m tall iron column with an elevation of 76.3 m above the sea level. It should be noted that the interference effect from the truss girder is relatively smaller compared to that from the box girder [18]. Accordingly, the field measurements from the ultrasonic anemometers in this study can well present the oncoming wind characteristics.…”
Section: Wireless Monitoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The two ultrasonic anemometers are installed at the top of 2.5 m tall iron column with an elevation of 76.3 m above the sea level. It should be noted that the interference effect from the truss girder is relatively smaller compared to that from the box girder [18]. Accordingly, the field measurements from the ultrasonic anemometers in this study can well present the oncoming wind characteristics.…”
Section: Wireless Monitoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Compared to the land-based measurement tower, the WMS installed on the bridge is apparently more representative and accurate. Although the WMS has become very popular and been treated as an essential part of the united wind and structural health monitoring system (WSHMS) in major and important bridges around the world to enhance structural safety and verify the current wind-induced vibration theory [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], most of the available studies concentrate on the wind characteristics and buffeting response of cable-supported bridges under the service stage. On the other On the other hand, it is well known that the cable-stayed bridges are considerably more vulnerable to oncoming wind turbulence during construction than after completion [8,[18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the longer and slimmer the bridges are, the more difficulties we have to face in analysis and design, especially aerodynamic effects such as buffeting, vortex, flutter and turbulence (refers Refs. [1][2][3][4], among others). In among many components of a cable-stayed bridge, stay cables with a very long length and a small cross-sectional area have low damping factors and a wide range of natural frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Zhu et al (2018) identified the six-component aerodynamic admittance of the closed-box bridge deck in a wind tunnel test. Ma et al (2019a) studied the aerodynamic characteristics of the bridge girder and buffeting response through field measurements. To date, few studies have measured the aerodynamic admittance function of a Π-shaped girder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%