2014
DOI: 10.2514/1.j052688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Characterization of a Wing Membrane with Variable Compliance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on heterogeneous wings has appeared more recently [85,64,63,82,17,48,47,66]. The majority of these studies focus on insect flight and, more specifically, simulating the coupled aeroelastic dynamics of compositionally complex wings [64,63,82,66].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on heterogeneous wings has appeared more recently [85,64,63,82,17,48,47,66]. The majority of these studies focus on insect flight and, more specifically, simulating the coupled aeroelastic dynamics of compositionally complex wings [64,63,82,66].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aerodynamic efficiency of membrane wings is found to be restricted in comparison to rigid flat plates due to higher drag penalties (Timpe et al, 2013;Galvao et al, 2006;Bleischwitz et al, 2015b). Recent attempts focused on active control of membrane wing performance by the use of electroactive membranes, allowing to gain control over mean camber adjustment or even modulating membrane vibrations (Curet et al, 2014;Hays et al, 2012). However, this challenging concept would add large electro-mechanic complexity in a MAV structure and most likely comes with a payload penalty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hays et al (2013) showed large lift control capability due to camber shape change under static voltage loads. Curet et al (2014) showed further control enhancements when the sinusoidal voltage excitation exploited the resonant frequencies of the coupled system. On the numerical side, Hays et al (2013) used a numerical model for the membrane structure to postprocess the experimental results and estimate membrane stresses and thickness but, to date, only Buoso and Palacios (2015) and Buoso and Palacios (2016) have developed an electro-aeromechanical model coupling high-fidelity descriptions of both fluid and structural domains.…”
Section: S Buoso Et Almentioning
confidence: 93%