1978
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-8434-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Drag Mechanisms of Bluff Bodies and Road Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this configuration, the drag reduction is seen to improve with increasing back face hole diameter up to the maximum diameter considered (1S-4B). These results agree generally with findings reported by Mair [9] on configurations using flow injection techniques (no side face porosity), where larger hole diameters in the base region, at low bleed rates, provide the most benefit. Compared to the 'closed' configuration, total reductions of CD  -12% for  = 0, and CD  -6% for  = 10.5, were measured.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this configuration, the drag reduction is seen to improve with increasing back face hole diameter up to the maximum diameter considered (1S-4B). These results agree generally with findings reported by Mair [9] on configurations using flow injection techniques (no side face porosity), where larger hole diameters in the base region, at low bleed rates, provide the most benefit. Compared to the 'closed' configuration, total reductions of CD  -12% for  = 0, and CD  -6% for  = 10.5, were measured.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Comparative bleed rates for minimum base pressure conditions are also presented in Mair [9]. Assessment of optimum back and side face porosity levels also showed general agreement with previous work [1,2,4,8] with the combination of 22.1 < B < 39.2 and S  1.3% for the back, and sides faces respectively (as defined in the current study), within the range showing the largest drag reduction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation