SAE Technical Paper Series 1980
DOI: 10.4271/801404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of Intercity Buses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5) in order to capture the boundary layers properly. Table 1 shows a grid independence study and the model's validation against literature for the bus drag coefficient [23]. The axial velocity examined for the results is perpendicular to grilles.…”
Section: Bus Model (Cfd #1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) in order to capture the boundary layers properly. Table 1 shows a grid independence study and the model's validation against literature for the bus drag coefficient [23]. The axial velocity examined for the results is perpendicular to grilles.…”
Section: Bus Model (Cfd #1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, vehicle aerodynamics is a field of research that has received considerable attention to reduce drag and thus, decrease fuel consumption. 14 In heavy vehicles, for example, aerodynamic drag can account for up to 80% of total motion resistance, which might be a great source of improvement. 5 Indeed, the fuel consumption of heavy vehicles has already been decreased by 3%–4% when aerodynamic drag was reduced by around 10%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this paper aims at elucidating some flow features over a commercial bus and to assess some potential alternatives of drag reduction devices. Moreover, only studies performed many years ago served as a starting point for this research, for instance, McDonald and Palmer 1 conducted wind tunnel tests to assess and select possible devices to reduce the drag coefficient on buses. Two kinds of vehicles were analyzed using front add-on modifications at several yawed conditions, obtaining drag reductions up to 19%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%