23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1985
DOI: 10.2514/6.1985-103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic effects of probe-induced flow separation of bluff bodiesat transonic Mach numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies of qualitatively similar flows have suggested that C D reaches a minimum value at a probe length slightly less than critical. 3 Guided by this, the critical length for the probe/cylinder might be approximated by the probe length midway between the minimum and plateau for subsonic flow and by the probe length at which the drag suddenly increases for supersonic flow. The length so determined appears in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies of qualitatively similar flows have suggested that C D reaches a minimum value at a probe length slightly less than critical. 3 Guided by this, the critical length for the probe/cylinder might be approximated by the probe length midway between the minimum and plateau for subsonic flow and by the probe length at which the drag suddenly increases for supersonic flow. The length so determined appears in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For relatively short probes, there is a single separated zone between the probe face and the cylinder face, whereas longer probes produce two separated zones in this region. 3 These two situations correspond to the open and closed modes, respectively, of a cavity or cutout in a wall 4 (see the inset of Fig. 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%