2022
DOI: 10.1134/s0021894422050121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Features of a Rotating Cylinder With a Deflector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the other three samples at 30 0 , 45 0 and 60 0 , at 0 0 , the combined blade produces maximum lift and minimum drag force. Compared with the experimental results of cylinders of different shapes (with a porous surface, with a deflector) [21][22] the obtained numerical data of the lift coefficient is almost 2 times higher, which makes it possible to assert that a combined blade is much more efficient than a single cylindrical blade and a blade from a cylinder with a deflector. Below is the dependence of the number of revolutions of the blade on the wind speed at different angles of attack (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the other three samples at 30 0 , 45 0 and 60 0 , at 0 0 , the combined blade produces maximum lift and minimum drag force. Compared with the experimental results of cylinders of different shapes (with a porous surface, with a deflector) [21][22] the obtained numerical data of the lift coefficient is almost 2 times higher, which makes it possible to assert that a combined blade is much more efficient than a single cylindrical blade and a blade from a cylinder with a deflector. Below is the dependence of the number of revolutions of the blade on the wind speed at different angles of attack (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…2). Focusing on the highly effective results of the well-known works of such several authors as N.K.Tanasheva and Dyusembaeva [19,[21][22], an optimal cylindrical blade with a diameter of 50 mm and a length of 300 mm was created. The width of the fixed blade was 33 mm, and the length was 300 mm.…”
Section: Geometry Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%