2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic interaction between propellers of a distributed-propulsion system in forward flight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed characterization of wing-propeller interaction effects is therefore necessary in the perspective of designing novel regional aircraft configurations exploiting tip propeller drag-reduction benefits. Lots of research efforts have been spent in the past on the experimental characterization of wing-propeller interactions, with recent test campaigns taking advantage of Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurement techniques applied to both inboard and outboard propeller installations [3,7]. Numerical studies using simplified analytical methodologies [8,9] or Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) techniques [10,11] have investigated different aspects of a single propeller installed inboard or at the wing tip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed characterization of wing-propeller interaction effects is therefore necessary in the perspective of designing novel regional aircraft configurations exploiting tip propeller drag-reduction benefits. Lots of research efforts have been spent in the past on the experimental characterization of wing-propeller interactions, with recent test campaigns taking advantage of Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurement techniques applied to both inboard and outboard propeller installations [3,7]. Numerical studies using simplified analytical methodologies [8,9] or Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) techniques [10,11] have investigated different aspects of a single propeller installed inboard or at the wing tip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the propulsion design framework is to allow the preliminary study and comparison of different configurations. The analysis focuses around the design of efficient propellers which can provide enough thrust during all phases of the mission, which are [3]: vertical take-off (1); transition from hover to climb (2); climb to cruising altitude (3); cruise (4); loiter in horizontal flight (5); descent (6); transition to hover (7); loiter in hover (8); and landing (9). A schematic of these phases can be seen in Figure 3.…”
Section: Propulsion System Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Wigeon, a propeller lateral separation of 0.3 m was chosen, which corresponds to 30% of the radius. A study by de Vries et al shows that, in horizontal flight, a distributed propulsion system using open rotors sees a drop in propeller efficiency of 1.5% for a separation between propeller tips of 2% of the propeller diameter [8]. In a different study carried out by Zhou et al, it was shown that the thrust coefficient of two propellers with a tip separation of 5% of the propeller diameter is within 2% of that of a single propeller under static thrust conditions, although a significant increase in thrust fluctuation is seen [9].…”
Section: Stall Of Blade Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zawodny et al [10] used unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) coupled with the Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings (FW-H) acoustic analogy to study broadband noise propagation for a small UAV while Afari et al [11] and Mankbadi et al [7] employed the DES turbulence formulation along with the FW-H formulation to investigate the propagation of both tonal and broadband noise generated by a small UAV to the far-field. Several experimental campaigns to acoustically characterise small UAVs include the work of Lu et al [12] and Intaratep et al [13] while aerodynamic interaction between the propellers of a DEP system is explored by Vries et al [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%