2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-2052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Interaction Effects of Tip-Mounted Propellers Installed on the Horizontal Tailplane

Abstract: Takedown policy Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As observed in previous work [27], the CFD simulations return a higher section lift coefficient than that obtained from the experiment, but the trends were captured at all thrust settings. As mentioned, the experimental results will be affected by the finite resolution of the pressure data available for integration, possibly explaining part of the offset.…”
Section: Wing Loadingsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As observed in previous work [27], the CFD simulations return a higher section lift coefficient than that obtained from the experiment, but the trends were captured at all thrust settings. As mentioned, the experimental results will be affected by the finite resolution of the pressure data available for integration, possibly explaining part of the offset.…”
Section: Wing Loadingsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The validity of the simulation approach was shown before in Refs. [18,27] and is, therefore, not discussed in the present paper.…”
Section: B Installed Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the setup of the validation experiment is summarized first. The full details of this experimental campaign are discussed by van Arnhem et al [15] A. Wind-Tunnel Facility and Models…”
Section: Validation Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21), an additional difference of the experiment compared to all propeller models is found in the inboard part of the slipstream, where an area with considerably higher tangential velocity is located. This is discussed in more detail by van Arnhem et al [15] In order to explain it, the interaction of the tip vortices with the wing should be considered first. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Propeller-wing Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These unsteady pylon loads can excite structural vibrations, which are transmitted into the airframe and can be perceived by the passengers as structure-borne noise, thereby reducing passenger comfort [13]. For typical cruise flight conditions, the upstream effect on the propeller loading is small [14], and the downstream effect is the dominant mechanism for the generation of harmonic loading [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%