2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11709-011-0129-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic interference effects and mitigation measures on vortex-induced vibrations of two adjacent cable-stayed bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, much of the literature has focused on the effects of AoA on bluff bodies (Mannini et al, 2017; Prosser and Smith, 2012; Wu et al, 2020b), and investigated the changing mechanism of the aerodynamic performance, pressure distribution and dynamic responses (Bartoli and Righi, 2006; Bruno et al, 2014; Mariotti et al, 2016). However, investigations of bridge sections have always focused on the dynamic responses (Hu et al, 2019; Laima et al, 2013; Meng et al, 2011), and little literature has studied the effects of AoA on the aerodynamics and pressure distributions of the streamlined box girder. Therefore, the mechanism of the aerodynamic characteristics and pressure distributions of the streamlined box girder varying with AoA is discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, much of the literature has focused on the effects of AoA on bluff bodies (Mannini et al, 2017; Prosser and Smith, 2012; Wu et al, 2020b), and investigated the changing mechanism of the aerodynamic performance, pressure distribution and dynamic responses (Bartoli and Righi, 2006; Bruno et al, 2014; Mariotti et al, 2016). However, investigations of bridge sections have always focused on the dynamic responses (Hu et al, 2019; Laima et al, 2013; Meng et al, 2011), and little literature has studied the effects of AoA on the aerodynamics and pressure distributions of the streamlined box girder. Therefore, the mechanism of the aerodynamic characteristics and pressure distributions of the streamlined box girder varying with AoA is discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recent study (Wang et al, 2020a) confirmed that the side-surface openings stabilized the vortex-induced vibration and galloping in a butterfly web girder with a side ratio, B/D, of 3.24, where B is the girder width and D is the girder depth. To accommodate an increase in traffic, a new bridge is sometimes constructed adjacent to an existing bridge (Honda et al, 1990;Meng et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2013;Argentini et al, 2015). Compared with the aerodynamic performance of a single stand-alone bridge, the aerodynamic performance of two bridges in tandem is more complicated and even more unstable (Honda et al, 1990;Kimura et al, 2008;Meng et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2013;Seo et al, 2013;Argentini et al, 2015;Park and Kim, 2017a;Park et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accommodate an increase in traffic, a new bridge is sometimes constructed adjacent to an existing bridge (Honda et al, 1990;Meng et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2013;Argentini et al, 2015). Compared with the aerodynamic performance of a single stand-alone bridge, the aerodynamic performance of two bridges in tandem is more complicated and even more unstable (Honda et al, 1990;Kimura et al, 2008;Meng et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2013;Seo et al, 2013;Argentini et al, 2015;Park and Kim, 2017a;Park et al, 2017b). This raises the question of whether butterfly web girders can exhibit good aerodynamic performance in a tandem arrangement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, the wind resistance and obstacle avoidance of UAV have become more concerns [23]. For example, Al-Kaff et al [24] used the monocular vision technology to determine the location of the UAV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%