2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/957421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Losses in Turbines with and without Film Cooling, as Influenced by Mainstream Turbulence, Surface Roughness, Airfoil Shape, and Mach Number

Abstract: The influences of a variety of different physical phenomena are described as they affect the aerodynamic performance of turbine airfoils in compressible, high-speed flows with either subsonic or transonic Mach number distributions. The presented experimental and numerically predicted results are from a series of investigations which have taken place over the past 32 years. Considered are (i) symmetric airfoils with no film cooling, (ii) symmetric airfoils with film cooling, (iii) cambered vanes with no film co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here subscripts i, e denote values of the total pressure (P o ) at the inlet and outlet evaluation planes, respectively, and the subscript se represents the static pressure at the evaluation plane; total pressure quantities were mass-flow averaged and static pressure quantities were area-averaged using the formulations of Ligrani. 20 It should be noted that the authors regularly observe mass averaged losses at a number of planes throughout the domain as well as mixed-out quantities; however, as to not include an extensive amount of data in the publication we did not include them in this report. However, as a means of transparency we have provided a table comparing the mass averaged losses at the evaluation plane, the mixed-out losses calculated from the evaluation plane and the mass averaged losses at the domain outlet for each airfoil at limit loading Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here subscripts i, e denote values of the total pressure (P o ) at the inlet and outlet evaluation planes, respectively, and the subscript se represents the static pressure at the evaluation plane; total pressure quantities were mass-flow averaged and static pressure quantities were area-averaged using the formulations of Ligrani. 20 It should be noted that the authors regularly observe mass averaged losses at a number of planes throughout the domain as well as mixed-out quantities; however, as to not include an extensive amount of data in the publication we did not include them in this report. However, as a means of transparency we have provided a table comparing the mass averaged losses at the evaluation plane, the mixed-out losses calculated from the evaluation plane and the mass averaged losses at the domain outlet for each airfoil at limit loading Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here subscripts i , e denote values of the total pressure ( P o ) at the inlet and outlet evaluation planes, respectively, and the subscript se represents the static pressure at the evaluation plane; total pressure quantities were mass-flow averaged and static pressure quantities were area-averaged using the formulations of Ligrani. 20…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that a number of methods have been suggested to estimate the aerodynamic loss pertinent to film cooling phenomena, including the methods based on thermodynamic loss, entropy loss, total pressure loss, and so on. Further information about the aerodynamic loss estimation of different film cooling designs can be found in the review paper of Ligrani [36]. In the present study, the aerodynamic loss of the BDSIC design was estimated by using the kinetic energy loss method as suggested by Sargison [37], which is based on the estimation of the aerodynamic penalty of an film cooling design by taking the energy component from the coolant jet flow into the account.…”
Section: The Effects Of the Neighboring Bdsics On The Film Cooling Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are varieties of methods to calculate the aerodynamic loss, such as using thermodynamic loss, entropy loss, total pressure loss, and so on. Please refer to the review paper by Ligrani 34 for more information. Based on total pressure deficit, Lee et al 35 investigated the aerodynamic loss of compounded film-cooling jet.…”
Section: E Hole Interaction Effect On Film Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%