AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-3852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Modeling, System Identification and Analysis of Iced Aircraft Configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, whereas there is only a minor influence on the aircraft's lift behavior in the left plot. Similar results [28] are given in Fig. 3 for a leading edge icing case, but in contrast to Fig.…”
Section: Icing Effects On Aircraftsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2, whereas there is only a minor influence on the aircraft's lift behavior in the left plot. Similar results [28] are given in Fig. 3 for a leading edge icing case, but in contrast to Fig.…”
Section: Icing Effects On Aircraftsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…2 for the run-back ice case of Ref. [28]. The significant drag increase due to ice accretion is visible on the right plot in Fig.…”
Section: Icing Effects On Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…accumulation as well as a de-icing can be triggered by the user whereas the details about the degradation itself are part of the closed model to allow a fair and realistic test of new developments like detection algorithms or robust flight controllers. The corresponding knowledge about the expectable effects and a realistic amount of degradation is derived from previous icing research at DLR [46,47] where high-quality simulation models were identified from flight data.…”
Section: Test Scenarios and Failure Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%