2015
DOI: 10.1017/s0001924000011143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic modelling of fin stabilised underslung loads

Abstract: Box-like slung loads exhibit periodic yaw response instabilities, while carried externally by a helicopter. When coupled with the slung load longitudinal and lateral pendulum motions, these instabilities result in significant pendulum oscillations of the load. High amplitude oscillations lead in many cases to the limiting of a load’s flight envelope. Using wind tunnel and flight tests, rear mounted fins were previously demonstrated as efficient means for stabilisation of a problematic load. However, the lack o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of these earlier studies were sufficient to support investigations to minimize the effect of the HSL instabilities such as attaching two vertical stabilizers to the top sides of a box and reported in a flight test experiment performed by Enciu and Rosen [9]. While this addition to the box showed promising stability at slow speeds, between 24.6 knots and 30.8 knots, the container still reached an increasingly unsteady state as velocity increased.…”
Section: A Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The results of these earlier studies were sufficient to support investigations to minimize the effect of the HSL instabilities such as attaching two vertical stabilizers to the top sides of a box and reported in a flight test experiment performed by Enciu and Rosen [9]. While this addition to the box showed promising stability at slow speeds, between 24.6 knots and 30.8 knots, the container still reached an increasingly unsteady state as velocity increased.…”
Section: A Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 57%