2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10041272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Optimization of a Micro Quadrotor Aircraft with Different Rotor Spacings in Hover

Abstract: In order to study the aerodynamic performance of the quadrotor with different rotor spacings in hover, experiments were performed together with numerical simulations. For experimental study, an experimental platform was designed to measure the thrust and power consumption of the quadrotor with different rotor spacings (L/R = 2.2, 2.6, 3.0, 3.2, 3.6, and 4.0), and to attempt to find out the optimal rotor configuration which makes the quadrotor have the best aerodynamic performance. In addition, the pressure dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of uncertainty presented in this study are all calculated for 95% confidence levels. Finally, according to the Kline-McClintock method [17], typical uncertainties in the nondimensional performance coefficients, C T , and C P are 1.6%, 1.5%, and 1.5% for FM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values of uncertainty presented in this study are all calculated for 95% confidence levels. Finally, according to the Kline-McClintock method [17], typical uncertainties in the nondimensional performance coefficients, C T , and C P are 1.6%, 1.5%, and 1.5% for FM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CFD application for the MAVs is limited to the region near the building. Lei and Wang [16,17] analyzed the aerodynamic performance and flow field characteristics of quadrotor-MAV by experiments and numerical simulation. It is founded that the rotors pacing at L/R = 3:6 (L is rotor spacing between the center of adjacent rotors, and R is the radius of the rotor) with a larger thrust and smaller power are considered to be the best aerodynamic configuration for the quadrotor in hover.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A settling chamber is attached before the test section to characterize the output wind. Considering that the multi-rotor aircraft is generally disturbed by light air (0.3-1.5 m/s), light breeze (1.6-3.3 m/s) and gentle breeze (3.4-5.4 m/s) in the natural environment [19], the averaged wind speeds of 2.5 m/s and 4.0 m/s are applied in the low-speed wind tunnel. In the tests, the thrust was measured by a thrust sensor (model: CZL605, accuracy: 0.02% F.S), and the power was obtained by collecting the voltage and current.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the horizontal wind gusts applied on the quadrotor is usually the light breeze (1.6~3.3 m/s) and the gentle breeze (3.4~5.4 m/s), the wind velocity 0 m/s, 2.5 m/s, 4.0 m/s were selected as the typical wind environment to obtain the variation of flow field, and finally to contrast with the case without incoming flow. The rotor spacing 1.8D was applied with better hovering performance [19].…”
Section: A Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd) Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%