DOI: 10.4203/ccp.98.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Optimization of the ICE 2 High-Speed Train Nose using a Genetic Algorithm and Metamodels

Abstract: An aerodynamic optimization of the ICE 2 high-speed train nose in term of front wind action sensitivity is carried out in this paper. The nose is parametrically defined by Bézier Curves, and a three-dimensional representation of the nose is obtained using thirty one design variables. This implies a more complete parametrization, allowing the representation of a real model. In order to perform this study a genetic algorithm (GA) is used. Using a GA involves a large number of evaluations before finding such opti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bézier curve model. Mun˜oz-Paniagua et al 18 replaced the Hicks-Henne shape functions with Be´zier curves to define the parametric contour lines of the train head and used this contour line to analyse…”
Section: Two-dimensional Parametric Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Bézier curve model. Mun˜oz-Paniagua et al 18 replaced the Hicks-Henne shape functions with Be´zier curves to define the parametric contour lines of the train head and used this contour line to analyse…”
Section: Two-dimensional Parametric Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,9,12,13 The idealized train model, the 2D elliptic curve model, and the Be´zier curve model were also designed to study the aerodynamic performance of the HST head. 8,[14][15][16][17][18] In contrast, 3D modelling methods use more factors to improve the modelling accuracy but this means more time is consumed in the process of optimization. Generally, there are three ways to parameterize the head shape in the 3D space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the aerodynamic resistance of the train in a tunnel is reduced by approximately 50% if the shape of the train nose is changed from blunt to streamlined (Choi and Kim 2014). Munoz-Paniagua et al (2012) and Paniagua et al (2011) not only optimized the train nose shape to reduce aerodynamic drag in the open air but also applied a genetic algorithm and numerical simulation method to the nose shape optimization of a high-speed train in a tunnel to minimize the pressure gradient of the compression wave and aerodynamic resistance of the train (Muñoz- Paniagua et al 2014). Doi et al (2010) measured the pressure wave of a train traversing a tunnel with a 1/30 scale moving model test device and analyzed the influence of the nose shape of the train on the strength and form of the pressure wave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Kwak et al (2013) established a three-dimensional control function for the train nose, investigated the influence of the cross-sectional shape of the train nose on the aerodynamic resistance of the train using the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno algorithm, and obtained a train nose shape that could reduce the aerodynamic resistance by 23%. Muñoz- Paniagua et al (2012) and Paniagua et al (2011) used a combination of genetic algorithms, metamodels, and artificial neural networks to optimize the nose shape and reduce the aerodynamic drag of high-speed trains. They also provided a schematic diagram of the optimization process and introduced the most relevant elements in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high-speed train head involves a lot of design variables and high smoothness requirements. Parametric surface modelling methods such as B-splines surfaces, Bézier surfaces and non-uniform rational B-splines (NURBS) surfaces are widely used in geometric design of the high-speed train head (Yao et al 2016;Suzuki and Nakade 2013;Muñoz Paniagua et al 2011). However, they are not ideal in using few surface patches to describe complicated shapes, easily and accurately controlling surface shapes, and achieving any highorder continuity which are required in shape modelling of high-speed strain heads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%