IABSE Symposium, Lisbon 2005: Structures and Extreme Events 2005
DOI: 10.2749/222137805796271549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Problems of a Super-long Span Cable-stayed Bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aerodynamic admittance function is omitted because it is not available from the wind-tunnel testing. The flutter derivatives of the SCB were measured by wind-tunnel tests at Tongji University (Chen et al, 2005), and the self-excited aerodynamic forces acting on the bridge deck are modeled with the element Matrix 27 in ANSYS (Hua et al, 2007). The other procedures used to analyze structural buffeting responses have been illustrated by Wang et al (2011).…”
Section: Buffeting Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aerodynamic admittance function is omitted because it is not available from the wind-tunnel testing. The flutter derivatives of the SCB were measured by wind-tunnel tests at Tongji University (Chen et al, 2005), and the self-excited aerodynamic forces acting on the bridge deck are modeled with the element Matrix 27 in ANSYS (Hua et al, 2007). The other procedures used to analyze structural buffeting responses have been illustrated by Wang et al (2011).…”
Section: Buffeting Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meantime the deck cross-sections of almost all long cable-stayed bridges were optimized from an aerodynamic point of view. The cross-section of the Sutong Bridge was chosen after various wind tunnel tests associated with aerodynamic instability (Chen et al, 2005). For the design of the Stonecutter Bridge, a twin box girder deck with a wide clear separation of 14.3 m was adopted, with which stability against flutter during both construction and in-service stages could be anticipated (critical 1-min wind speed higher than 95 m/s) (Larose et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%