2008
DOI: 10.2514/1.34112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Redesign Using Discrete Adjoint Approach on Overset Mesh System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most previous design works were conducted focusing on uniform sinusoidal plunging and pitching motions, where the number of design parameters is small (limited to two or three), because of a prohibitive computational cost in unsteady optimization problems-even with an efficient gradient-based method. In a realistic aerodynamic shape optimization, the number of design D parameters needed to adequately describe an airfoil shape in transonic flow can vary from O (10) to O(100), even for a two-dimensional airfoil application [8][9][10]. As a result, the design cost of optimization based on CFD is expensive, even with today's computation power; hence a judicious choice of optimization approach for the current problem is warranted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most previous design works were conducted focusing on uniform sinusoidal plunging and pitching motions, where the number of design parameters is small (limited to two or three), because of a prohibitive computational cost in unsteady optimization problems-even with an efficient gradient-based method. In a realistic aerodynamic shape optimization, the number of design D parameters needed to adequately describe an airfoil shape in transonic flow can vary from O (10) to O(100), even for a two-dimensional airfoil application [8][9][10]. As a result, the design cost of optimization based on CFD is expensive, even with today's computation power; hence a judicious choice of optimization approach for the current problem is warranted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the design cost of optimization based on CFD is expensive, even with today's computation power; hence a judicious choice of optimization approach for the current problem is warranted. In our study, we adopt the approach of using adjoint sensitivity analyses [8][9][10] in our aerodynamic shape and trajectory optimizations for flapping airfoils.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adjoint method enables the computation of all shape sensitivities for a given problem at the cost of only one flow solution and one adjoint solution [22]. As a result of its efficiency, the adjoint method has become widely used for aircraft design, evolving to the design optimisation of full wing-body configurations [23]. The adjoint method has also been considered an enabling technology for MDO of complex configurations [24], recent examples include aerostructural design optimisation [25] and sonic boom mitigation [26].…”
Section: Modern Cfd-based Design Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of its efficiency, the adjoint method has become widely used for aircraft design, evolving to the design optimisation of full wing-body configurations [23,26]. This section will provide a brief review of adjoint studies that have focused on the design of hypersonic aircraft.…”
Section: Hypersonic Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%