2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-89890-2_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Shape Optimization by Considering Geometrical Imperfections Using Polynomial Chaos Expansion and Evolutionary Algorithms

Abstract: Uncertainties, in the form of either non-predictable shape imperfections (manufacturing) or flow conditions which are not absolutely fixed (environmental) are involved in all aerodynamic shape optimization problems. In this paper, a workflow for performing aerodynamic shape optimization under uncertainties, by taking manufacturing uncertainties into account is proposed. The uncertainty quantification (UQ) for the objective function is carried out based on the non-intrusive Polynomial Chaos Expansion (niPCE) me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the statistical moments of the QoI are computed by the UQ software, a suitable objective function is formulated and the optimization problem under uncertainties is defined, Section 2. Though evolutionary algorithms have been used to solve problems in the presence of uncertainties, [21][22][23] the high number of required evaluations (compared to gradient-based approaches) combined with the relatively high UQ evaluation cost of each candidate solution is a deterrent factor. If gradient-based optimization is used instead, the gradient of the objective function w.r.t.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the statistical moments of the QoI are computed by the UQ software, a suitable objective function is formulated and the optimization problem under uncertainties is defined, Section 2. Though evolutionary algorithms have been used to solve problems in the presence of uncertainties, [21][22][23] the high number of required evaluations (compared to gradient-based approaches) combined with the relatively high UQ evaluation cost of each candidate solution is a deterrent factor. If gradient-based optimization is used instead, the gradient of the objective function w.r.t.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%