Wind Engineering 1980
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4832-8367-8.50088-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Stability Criteria of One-Way Types of Hanging Roofs in Smooth Uniform Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, it is believed that when the damping of the structure decreases to zero, flutter will occur (Haruo, 1975;Kawamura and Kimoto, 1979;Yang and Liu, 2005). As a result, the damping of the structure is usually used to judge whether flutter occurs.…”
Section: Damping Ratio For the Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Usually, it is believed that when the damping of the structure decreases to zero, flutter will occur (Haruo, 1975;Kawamura and Kimoto, 1979;Yang and Liu, 2005). As a result, the damping of the structure is usually used to judge whether flutter occurs.…”
Section: Damping Ratio For the Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…He suggested the vibration was a divergent flutter. Kawamura and Kimoto (1979) used modified thin airfoil theory to deduce the aerodynamic stability criteria for one-way tensioned membranes and defined the first two critical velocities as the wind velocity where the total damping was equal to zero and the wind velocity where one mode disappears and another mode appears. They also tested the response of a full-scale one-way tensioned membrane under the action of the wind (Kimoto and Kawamura, 1983) and found that above a certain wind velocity the vibration amplitude of the roof increased rapidly; that wind velocity was called the critical velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damping coefficient and the restoring force seem to vary with the sign and the extent of amplitude in the structure, when the initial tension is only controlled by weight of the roof. In a full-scale structure under natural wind action, the amplitude is shown to increase rapidly beyond a certain wind velocity, which is known as the "starting velocity" [14] [15]. It was pointed out that aerodynamic problems could be classified into two parts: (1) stability problems; (2) response problems.…”
Section: Aeroelastic Wind Tunnel Test On Flexible Roof Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But those methods are all based on the condition that the inlet of flow is determined beforehand, so they cannot consider the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) actually. To determine the exact wind loads of tension structures, especially for the effect of wind-structure interaction, wind tunnel tests or semiempirical methods have been developed (Irwin and Wardlaw, 1979;Kawamura and Kimoto, 1979). However, some unavoidable errors will occur when using those semi-empirical methods, and wind tunnel test is too expensive to carry out for large-scale researches, so it is commonly used for some special structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%