1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf00833471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamics of a jet in a fluidized bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is confirmed by experiment [3,6], which shows that the frequency of jet disruption does not remain constant and is dependent on the flow conditions; this frequency fm may be 6-48 tiz or more in the jet condition, and the flow of the jet may be considered as quasistationary, with constant maximal parameters in the fluidized bed, which can be calculated via (1)-( 5), ( 7)- (9), and (17). The parametric criterion Xj/Hp [3] defines the existence of the jet condition and, as a special case, the condition for local existence of a fountain.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is confirmed by experiment [3,6], which shows that the frequency of jet disruption does not remain constant and is dependent on the flow conditions; this frequency fm may be 6-48 tiz or more in the jet condition, and the flow of the jet may be considered as quasistationary, with constant maximal parameters in the fluidized bed, which can be calculated via (1)-( 5), ( 7)- (9), and (17). The parametric criterion Xj/Hp [3] defines the existence of the jet condition and, as a special case, the condition for local existence of a fountain.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…we obtain, after substitution of (13)-( 16) into (11) and certain transformations, the equation for the mean density in the boundary layer of the jet in the main section: If pg is much less than Pro, as follows from (1)-( 5), (9), and (17), it is inevitable that a discontinuity occurs in the jet [1,4]. This is confirmed by experiment [3,6], which shows that the frequency of jet disruption does not remain constant and is dependent on the flow conditions; this frequency fm may be 6-48 tiz or more in the jet condition, and the flow of the jet may be considered as quasistationary, with constant maximal parameters in the fluidized bed, which can be calculated via (1)-( 5), ( 7)- (9), and (17). The parametric criterion Xj/Hp [3] defines the existence of the jet condition and, as a special case, the condition for local existence of a fountain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although many researchers (Shakhova and Minaev, 1970;Yang and Keairns, 1978;Gidaspow et al, 1983a;Rowe et al, 1979) describe the jet behaviour as being unsteady, all the above models consider the jet as being permanent. We propose here a new approach which accounts for the fluctuating nature of the jet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%