1995
DOI: 10.2514/3.12990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeroelastic analysis of multibladed hingeless rotors in hover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agreement is due to the use of the same profile drag coefficient in both aerodynamic models. However, the difference between the results at high collective pitch angles appears since the two-dimensional aerodynamic model overestimates induced drag (Cho and Lee, 1995). Also, it is shown that the torsional deflections predicted by the present method are about two-thirds of those given by the two-dimensional theory.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This agreement is due to the use of the same profile drag coefficient in both aerodynamic models. However, the difference between the results at high collective pitch angles appears since the two-dimensional aerodynamic model overestimates induced drag (Cho and Lee, 1995). Also, it is shown that the torsional deflections predicted by the present method are about two-thirds of those given by the two-dimensional theory.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Because the simplicity and low computational cost of VLMs increase their applicability, they are still being widely used in many aviation projects instead of CFD methods, which are far more demanding [31]. VLMs have helped researchers investigate the influences of rotorcraft configuration and flying environment on its aerodynamic performance [52], noise generation [55,86], flight control [87], and aeroelasticity response [88]. (…”
Section: Vortex Lattice Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%