2005
DOI: 10.2514/1.5608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeroelastic Calculations for the Hawk Aircraft Using the Euler Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The systems (8) and (10) constitute the original RBF formulation defined to perform CFD-CSM interpolation. In this case, the inclusion of a polynomial term (5), at least of first order, is mandatory to ensure conservation of total force and moment [19].…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systems (8) and (10) constitute the original RBF formulation defined to perform CFD-CSM interpolation. In this case, the inclusion of a polynomial term (5), at least of first order, is mandatory to ensure conservation of total force and moment [19].…”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-linear flutter phenomena including limit cycle oscillations (LCO) are known to be related to aerodynamic contributions of the stores and not just their inertia effects (see Woodgate et al [3]). Since the mutual aerodynamic interference of the wing and the stores cannot be neglected, the stores and their surrounding flow must be adequately modeled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demonstrations of the potential of such methods for engineering analysis include studies by Melville [1], Pranata et al [2], and Woodgate et al [3] with structured grids method to Farhat and Lesoinne [4] with unstructured grids methods. Farhat et al [5] impressively demonstrated that aeroelastic parameters of a complete F-16 configuration at five different transonic Mach numbers can be computed in a single day with a 128-processor machine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1189 monolithic and partitioned approaches have been proposed to cope with the multi-disciplinary nature of the problem. The monolithic approach uses a tailored aero-structural solver [1, 2], while the partitioned approach favours the coupling of existing structural and fluid solvers [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. The partitioned approach is used almost as standard, including within the CFD Group at the University of Bristol [6-9], because it allows the use of existing software and grids, but synchronization of the structure and fluid at each time level must be done iteratively [6,7,9].However, the partitioned approach raises a difficult question in terms of information transfer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%