2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeroelastic response of rocket nozzles to asymmetric thrust loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To optimize the shape of the nozzle to provide the maximum thrust, the results of the simulation of flows of an inviscid and viscous compressible gas were applied in [9,10]. The flow in the nozzle and the stress-strain state of the nozzle walls (coupled modeling) associated with the occurrence of asymmetric loads were discussed in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To optimize the shape of the nozzle to provide the maximum thrust, the results of the simulation of flows of an inviscid and viscous compressible gas were applied in [9,10]. The flow in the nozzle and the stress-strain state of the nozzle walls (coupled modeling) associated with the occurrence of asymmetric loads were discussed in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compressible fluid-structure interaction (FSI) occurs in a broad range of technical applications involving, e.g., nonlinear aeroelasticity [16,42] and shock-induced deformations of rocket nozzles [23,55]. The numerical modeling and simulation of compressible FSI can be challenging, in particular if an accurate representation of the structural interface within the fluid solver and a consistent coupling of both subdomains is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These improvements were not realized until 2008, when Zhang, et al [5] embarked on probably the first coupled CFD/CSD methodology for aeroelastic nozzle study, by coupling among a full NavierStokes solver CFD-FASTRAN, a CSD code FEM-STRESS, and an interface code MDICE, on a quasi-steady, twodimensional nozzle. In 2013, the same methodology was further demonstrated to show aeroelastic deformation of nozzle wall by Zhao et al [6], on a quasi-steady, three-dimensional analysis of a J-2S nozzle for 0.1818 s of elapsed time. These developments represent advances over earlier simple aeroelastic nozzle analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…While examining the recent aeroelastic analyses [5,6], the CFD and CSD computations were carried out in different codes and those codes were only connected through an interface code, thus the analyses can only be categorized as loosely coupled aeroelastic solutions [6]. Very recently, Wang et al [7] made an effort to implement the necessary CSD formulations directly into a CFD code, thereby providing a tightly coupled solution of the two-way fluid and structure interactions and potentially be more computationally efficient and accurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation