2021
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2021.452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerofoil wake-induced transition characteristics on a flat-plate boundary layer

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slight downwards shift of the profile at the most advanced chordwise positions is due to the flow finishing the transition process. These observations made in figures 18 and 19( fj, non-modal) implies the co-existence of both modal and non-modal instability mechanisms, confirming the observations in DNS (Hosseinverdi & Fasel 2019) and experimental investigations (Istvan & Yarusevych 2018;Verdoya et al 2021) on LSBs subjected to FST, along with the experimental results of Veerasamy et al (2021) for an attached boundary layer developing over a flat plate. In contrast, in configurations where Tu < 1 % (refer to figure 19(a-e), modal), wall-normal disturbance profiles do not agree with theoretical predictions and do not exhibit the same behaviour as for configurations with Tu > 1 %, with the maxima of the peaks being in the range y/δ 1 = 0.3-0.5, implying that there is no formation of streaks and that only a modal transition mechanism is present.…”
Section: Co-existence Of a Modal And A Non-modal Instabilitiessupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The slight downwards shift of the profile at the most advanced chordwise positions is due to the flow finishing the transition process. These observations made in figures 18 and 19( fj, non-modal) implies the co-existence of both modal and non-modal instability mechanisms, confirming the observations in DNS (Hosseinverdi & Fasel 2019) and experimental investigations (Istvan & Yarusevych 2018;Verdoya et al 2021) on LSBs subjected to FST, along with the experimental results of Veerasamy et al (2021) for an attached boundary layer developing over a flat plate. In contrast, in configurations where Tu < 1 % (refer to figure 19(a-e), modal), wall-normal disturbance profiles do not agree with theoretical predictions and do not exhibit the same behaviour as for configurations with Tu > 1 %, with the maxima of the peaks being in the range y/δ 1 = 0.3-0.5, implying that there is no formation of streaks and that only a modal transition mechanism is present.…”
Section: Co-existence Of a Modal And A Non-modal Instabilitiessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…2021) on LSBs subjected to FST, along with the experimental results of Veerasamy et al. (2021) for an attached boundary layer developing over a flat plate. In contrast, in configurations where (refer to figure 19( a – e ), modal), wall-normal disturbance profiles do not agree with theoretical predictions and do not exhibit the same behaviour as for configurations with , with the maxima of the peaks being in the range , implying that there is no formation of streaks and that only a modal transition mechanism is present.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations