2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02702209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeromagnetic study of peninsular India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that from aeromagnetic studies also, similar inferences were drawn by other workers; reported kimberlites (Nayak et al 1999) in the region are found to be associated with the intersections of the NW-SE and NE-SW trending structural features in the region (Anand and Rajaram, 2002;Harikumar et al 2000;Sharma et al 1999).…”
Section: Maddur-narayanpet Areasupporting
confidence: 62%
“…It is interesting to note that from aeromagnetic studies also, similar inferences were drawn by other workers; reported kimberlites (Nayak et al 1999) in the region are found to be associated with the intersections of the NW-SE and NE-SW trending structural features in the region (Anand and Rajaram, 2002;Harikumar et al 2000;Sharma et al 1999).…”
Section: Maddur-narayanpet Areasupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Harikumar et al (2000), drawing their inferences from aeromagnetic studies, commented upon the limited strike extent of the Chitradurga thrust, indicating its local nature. Similarly, Gokarn et al (2001) reported upwarping of a shallow conductor (at a depth of about 20 km) below Chitradurga.…”
Section: Dharwar Craton: a Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytic signal method has been used extensively in magnetic interpretation (e.g., Nabighan, 1972;Roest et al, 1992;Mohan and Babu, 1995;Hsu et al, 1998;Harikumar et al, 2000;Bastani and Pedersen, 2001;Salem et al, 2002;Rajaram, 2003, 2004;Keating and Sailhac, 2004). This signal exhibits maxima over magnetization contrasts, independent of the ambient magnetic field and source magnetization directions.…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the analytic signal can be used to outline magnetic contrasts and their approximate depths, and it is possible to determine the signature of the causative body of the magnetic anomaly from the exact shape of the analytic signal (Roest et al, 1992). At low latitudes, an extensive source body will have a stronger analytical signal at their north and south edges (Harikumar et al, 2000;Rajaram, 2003, 2004). In order to understand the distribution of magnetic sources in the study region, the analytical signal of the aeromagnetic anomalies were computed based on the above procedure (Fig.…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%