1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf00285551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol deposition on plant leaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The urban forest of Fallon contains many kinds of trees, and elm (Ulmus), mulberry (Morus), cottonwood (Populus), and ash (Fraxinus) were the most common tree types sampled. Accumulation of aerosols onto leaves can be affected by leaf characteristics such as roughness, pubescence, moisture, and stickiness (Wedding et al, 1977), but these characteristics of leaves do not vary appreciably across the tree species sampled in this study.…”
Section: Leaf Collectionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The urban forest of Fallon contains many kinds of trees, and elm (Ulmus), mulberry (Morus), cottonwood (Populus), and ash (Fraxinus) were the most common tree types sampled. Accumulation of aerosols onto leaves can be affected by leaf characteristics such as roughness, pubescence, moisture, and stickiness (Wedding et al, 1977), but these characteristics of leaves do not vary appreciably across the tree species sampled in this study.…”
Section: Leaf Collectionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In an Ohio study, Dochinger (1972) examined dustfall and suspended particulate matter in three areas; treeless, deciduous canopy, and conifer canopy, and concluded that trees have the capacity to reduce particulate pollutants in the atmosphere. Wedding et al (1975) found, under controlled wind tunnel conditions, that particulate deposition on rough pubescent sunflower leaves was 10 times greater than on smooth, waxy tulip poplar leaves. They concluded that particulate retention could be quantitatively determined for plants existing in an environment of known aerosol concentration.…”
Section: Trees As Filters 319mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Lead particles observed on the bark of pine and elm trees ranged from 3 to 13 /zm in size (Heichel and Hankin 1972). Wedding et al (1975) concluded that deposition rate per unit leaf area for assemblages of leaves was essentially identical to single leaves, that is, the rate was linearly related to the total leaf area.…”
Section: Preliminary Observations Of Urban Tree Particulate Contaminamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Laboratory experiments determined that the presence of trichomes has an effect on the deposition of fine particles on leaf surfaces (Little, 1977;Wedding et al, 1977;Beckett et al, 2000b). Wedding et al (1977) and Little (1977) showed that pubescent leaves captured more aerosols than smooth leaves.…”
Section: Trichomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wedding et al (1977) and Little (1977) showed that pubescent leaves captured more aerosols than smooth leaves. Beckett et al (2000b) also showed that hairy leaves enhanced the particle capture efficiency in NaCl exposure experiments.…”
Section: Trichomesmentioning
confidence: 99%