1999
DOI: 10.1029/1998jd200072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol effects on UV radiation in nonurban regions

Abstract: Abstract. The effect of variable tropospheric aerosol conditions on UV radiation is analyzed using both model simulations and UV radiation measurements. A sensitivity study of the aerosol effect on UV radiation is performed by numerical modeling with a focus on the dependence on wavelength, solar zenith angle, and detector geometry. Potential day to day variability in atmospheric aerosols produces changes of spectral integrated radiation quantities of the order of 20% to 45%. Equivalent effects are induced by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been shown by that UVB irradiance may change by 2 to 35% if the aerosol optical depth varies between 0.2 and 1 at 355 nm. Similarly Reuder & Schwander (1999) found a reduction of 25% of UV irradiances between clean (AOD = 0.1, Single Scattering Albedo SSA = 0.95 at 400 nm) and turbid (AOD = 0.8, SSA = 0.88 at 400 nm) atmospheres. Although the empirical models do not include an explicit treatment of aerosols, their relatively good correspondences can be explained by the fact that the regression technique implicitly takes aerosols into account.…”
Section: Comparison Between Models and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been shown by that UVB irradiance may change by 2 to 35% if the aerosol optical depth varies between 0.2 and 1 at 355 nm. Similarly Reuder & Schwander (1999) found a reduction of 25% of UV irradiances between clean (AOD = 0.1, Single Scattering Albedo SSA = 0.95 at 400 nm) and turbid (AOD = 0.8, SSA = 0.88 at 400 nm) atmospheres. Although the empirical models do not include an explicit treatment of aerosols, their relatively good correspondences can be explained by the fact that the regression technique implicitly takes aerosols into account.…”
Section: Comparison Between Models and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to study this variability in AOD in more detail, we used HYSPLIT-based trajectories (Rolph, 2003) to determine the origin of air masses arriving at Tõravere, as well as MODIS Fire Mapper products to give an idea about the location and extent of fires at each day. Figure 4 shows the active fires detected by the MODIS Rapid Response System from 28 April to 30 April.…”
Section: Comparison Of Modis and Aeronet Derived Aodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier results indeed indicate that aerosols can cause a considerable reduction in the surface UV irradiance. In the extreme, this reduction can be up to 50% (e.g., Reuder and Schwander, 1999;Krotkov et al, 1998), although more typical values for this reduction associated with biomass burning aerosols range from 15-35% (e.g., Latha et al, 2004;Kalashnikova et al, 2007). The net effect that atmospheric aerosols exert on the surface radiation is a complex matter and strongly depends on both scattering and absorption characteristics, which in turn depend on wavelength and relative humidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total column ozone amount is particularly important as ozone is the dominant atmospheric absorber of UV-B and UV-C radiation (UNEP 1998). Furthermore, UV doses depend strongly on aerosol loading (e.g., Kazadzis et al 2007;Reuder and Schwander 1999;Ruckstuhl et al 2008), surface albedo (e.g., Blumthaler and Ambach 1988), and altitude (e.g., Blumthaler et al 1997;Schmucki and Philipona 2002). Cloudiness often masks the influence of TCO changes on UV radiation and may, depending on cloud type and amount, cancel, reduce, or enhance UV signals (e.g., Bais et al 1993;Feister et al 2015;Glandorf et al 2005;Rieder et al 2010c;Seckmeyer et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%