1983
DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400060332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol exposure of cattle to foot-and-mouth disease virus

Abstract: Slight modifications of a small, plastic covered greenhouse provided a chamber for the exposure of cattle of all ages to aerosols of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Particle size distributions of aerosols were 76% less than 3 microns, 17% 3-6 microns, and 7% greater than 6 microns immediately after the deVilbis no. 40 nebulizer used was turned off and 90% less than 3 microns, 8% 3-6 microns, and 2% greater than 6 microns 20-30 min later. Pharyngeal virus growth curves and viremia patterns correlated well with th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deposition during atmospheric transmission of aerosols depends on the size of the aerosols wherefore knowledge regarding the size distribution for the exhaled aerosols is required. In 1969 Sellers et al reported a distribution of the aerosol diameter with 65-71% larger than 6 μm, 19-24% between 3 and 6 μm and 10-11% smaller than 3 μm for pigs [71], and corresponding values of 50%, 25% and 25% for cattle [72]. The data for cattle was reported to have higher uncertainties than the data for pigs.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deposition during atmospheric transmission of aerosols depends on the size of the aerosols wherefore knowledge regarding the size distribution for the exhaled aerosols is required. In 1969 Sellers et al reported a distribution of the aerosol diameter with 65-71% larger than 6 μm, 19-24% between 3 and 6 μm and 10-11% smaller than 3 μm for pigs [71], and corresponding values of 50%, 25% and 25% for cattle [72]. The data for cattle was reported to have higher uncertainties than the data for pigs.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinct primary viraemia has been identified in the pathogenesis of morbilliviruses (Auwaerter et al., 1999; von Messling et al., 2004) and herpesviruses (Cohen, et al, 2007). There are sporadic reports of detection of transient, low titre (trace) viraemia in cattle following contact infection or exposure to FMDV aerosols (Hofner, 1995; McVicar and Eisner, 1983; Sutmoller and McVicar, 1976b). Additionally, in calves exposed to aerosolized virus, the detection of FMDV RNA in pedal and oral epithelia at six hpi, before the onset of ‘true’ viraemia and clinical signs is best explained by haematogenous spread (Brown et al., 1992).…”
Section: Pre‐viraemia and Primary Sites Of Infection In Cattlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such systems allow precise control of timing and dosage of the virus challenge while preserving the natural engagement of the mucosal immune system and reducing the numbers of study-animals required. For cattle, FMDV inoculation by a natural (aerogenous) route has been demonstrated by delivery of naturally generated aerosol using an improvised apparatus (Donaldson et al, 1987), artificially generated aerosol using improvised apparatus (Brown et al, 1992;Brown et al, 1996;Donaldson et al, 1987;McVicar and Eisner, 1983), artificially generated aerosol using standardized apparatus (Arzt et al, 2010a;, or by virus-moistened gauze deposition on the nasal planum (Korn, 1957). Other investigators have inoculated FMDV using an intranasal delivery system developed for use in humans or deposition of virus suspension using tubing with a length of 5 cm (Sutmoller et al, 1968) or 10 cm (Graves et al, 1971;McVicar et al, 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%