2019
DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-1365-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol light absorption from optical measurements of PTFE membrane filter samples: sensitivity analysis of optical depth measures

Abstract: Mass absorption cross section (MAC) measurements of atmospherically relevant aerosols are required to quantify their effect on Earth's radiative budget. Estimating aerosol light absorption from transmittance and/or reflectance measurements through filter deposits is an attractive option because of their ease of deployment in field settings, low cost, and the ability to revisit previously analyzed samples. These measurements suffer from artifacts that depend on a given filter measurement system and aerosol opti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…MAC PM values are approximately log-normally distributed with average (and 95% confidence intervals) of 0.54 (0.10–1.46) m 2 g –1 , consistent with values (0.4–1.5 m 2 g –1 ) derived from in situ (photoacoustic) absorption measurements and corresponding mass emission factors of particulate matter from biomass cookstoves in Nepal. MAC PM values in this study are slightly smaller than those from our earlier analysis on a smaller set of samples from Indian cookstove emissions, largely due to improved treatment of filter artifacts . Our estimates are significantly smaller than MAC PM (range of 0.5–6.6 m 2 g –1 ) calculated using other filter-based measurements of absorption from cookstove emissions in laboratory or field , settings.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MAC PM values are approximately log-normally distributed with average (and 95% confidence intervals) of 0.54 (0.10–1.46) m 2 g –1 , consistent with values (0.4–1.5 m 2 g –1 ) derived from in situ (photoacoustic) absorption measurements and corresponding mass emission factors of particulate matter from biomass cookstoves in Nepal. MAC PM values in this study are slightly smaller than those from our earlier analysis on a smaller set of samples from Indian cookstove emissions, largely due to improved treatment of filter artifacts . Our estimates are significantly smaller than MAC PM (range of 0.5–6.6 m 2 g –1 ) calculated using other filter-based measurements of absorption from cookstove emissions in laboratory or field , settings.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…MAC PM values in this study are slightly smaller than those from our earlier analysis 19 on a smaller set of samples from Indian cookstove emissions, largely due to improved treatment of filter artifacts. 36 Our estimates are significantly smaller than MAC PM (range of 0.5−6.6 m 2 g −1 ) calculated using other filter-based measurements of absorption from cookstove emissions in laboratory 41 or field 13,47 settings.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biomass burning experiments were carried out using 10 g of selected biofuels for each burn in a specialized experimental burn chamber at Washington University in St. Louis. 23,24,33,34 The sealed 21 m 3 stainless steel chamber is equipped with a computer-controlled ignition system and a recirculation fan. The ignition system is a 1 kW ring heater (McMaster-Carr 2927094A) coupled to a 1/ a K-type thermocouple to close the control loop.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model estimates suggest that increased inhalation exposure to outdoor BBOA is responsible for a considerable number of premature deaths globally each year . The chemical composition and optical properties of BBOA are strongly influenced by regional vegetation types, underscoring the need to understand biofuel-specific contributions to overall atmospheric BBOA and their impacts. This understanding is pivotal for accurate source apportionment and modeling of the individual and collective impacts of emissions from wild and prescribed fires.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%