Aerosol-precipitation interactions in the southern Appalachian Mountains

Abstract

There are many uncertainties associated with aerosol-precipitation interactions, particularly in mountain regions where a variety of processes at different spatial scales influence precipitation patterns. Aerosol-precipitation linkages were examined in the southern Appalachian Mountains, guided by the following research questions: (1) how do aerosol properties observed during precipitation events vary by season (e.g., summer vs. winter) and synoptic event type (e.g., frontal vs. non-frontal); and (2) what influence does air mass source region have on aerosol properties? Precipitation events were identified based on regional precipitation data and classified using a synoptic classification scheme developed for this study. Hourly aerosol data were collected at the Appalachian Atmospheric Interdisciplinary Research (AppalAIR) facility at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC (1110 m a.s.l., 36.215°, −81.680°). Backward air trajectories provided information on upstream atmospheric characteristics and source regions. During the warm season (June to September), greater aerosol loading dominated by larger particles was observed, while cool season (November to April) precipitation events exhibited overall lower aerosol loading with an apparent influence from biomass burning particles. Aerosol-induced precipitation enhancement may have been detected in each season, particularly during warm season non-frontal precipitation

Major air pollutants seasonal variation analysis and long-range transport of PM10 in an urban environment with specific climate condition in Transylvania (Romania)

“…Cluster analysis is a strong and essential technique known to be used to decipher the origin of air masses or the transport of pollutants arriving in a specific location. The HYSPLIT method is based on TSV (Lu et al 2018), representing the total variance between clusters, and on the other hand on SPVAR, which is the minimum increase of spatial variance between cluster components (Kelly et al 2012;Adame et al 2014;Stein et al 2015).…”

Five Years (2014–2018) of Beta Activity Concentration and the Impact of Synoptic and Local Meteorological Conditions in Bilbao (Northern Spain)

“…The cluster technique implemented in the HYSPLIT model [22] was used to identify airflow patterns, and synoptic scenarios. This technique has worked very well in previous studies [23], and more information can be found in the HYSPLIT model user guide.…”

The risk of cross-border pollution and the influence of regional climate on the rainwater chemistry in the Southern Carpathians, Romania

“…All of the back trajectories of each location were clustered using SPVAR (cluster spatial variance) calculations and then the total spatial variance (TSV) (Su et al 2015) was calculated, respectively. SPVAR is the sum of the squared distances between the endpoints of the cluster's component trajectories and the mean of the trajectories in that cluster (Draxler and Hess 1997;Perry and Soule 2012). Finally, the optimum number of clusters was selected using the TSV change as well.…”