2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol radiative forcing controls: Results from an Indian table-top mining region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface temperature is taken as 300°K. Sensitivity of aerosol radiative forcing to changes in typical temperature and moisture profiles (from tropical to mid-latitude winter or summer) mentioned in SBDART is reported to be insignificant (Latha et al, 2013). Exponential decrease of aerosol concentration is assumed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surface temperature is taken as 300°K. Sensitivity of aerosol radiative forcing to changes in typical temperature and moisture profiles (from tropical to mid-latitude winter or summer) mentioned in SBDART is reported to be insignificant (Latha et al, 2013). Exponential decrease of aerosol concentration is assumed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AOD based on satellite data is also higher over Varanasi in comparison to Ranchi, follows more reduction of incoming solar energy which is directly proportional to AOD. Earlier studies Latha et al, 2013) have shown the importance of SSA, the ratio of scattering coefficient to extinction coefficient, which is crucially affected by absorbing aerosols (mainly BC), in increasing the aerosol radiative forcing. Since BC is higher in Varanasi, effective SSA also may be lower, increasing the effective radiation cutoff.…”
Section: Bc Radiative Forcingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerosols, through scattering and absorption of solar radiation, affect the earth‐atmosphere system directly through various pathways, namely, (1) reduce the incident radiative flux at the surface [ Pathak et al , ; Latha et al , ; Singh et al , ; Stanhill and Cohen, ], (2) heat the atmosphere through absorption by absorbing aerosols [ Sreekanth et al , ], (3) increase photosynthesis by enhancing diffuse radiation and increase transpiration [ Wild et al , ; Wang et al , ], and (4) alter atmospheric stability, surface energy balance, convection and clouds, etc [ Ramanathan and Ramana , ]. Aerosol radiative forcing (RF) is a measure of change in net solar radiative flux (in specific wavelength range; shortwave and longwave) caused by aerosols (net radiation with aerosols − net radiation without aerosols) under clear sky conditions at any level (including at surface/bottom and TOA) in the atmosphere.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared solar fluxes at surface with that simulated by SBDART. A comparison of simulated and observed hourly fluxes for 4 completely clear sky days representing 1 day in each season exhibits a correlation coefficient of 0.98 with a bias of 7.7 Wm −2 [ Latha et al , ]. Monthly RF is obtained using monthly mean aerosol optical properties in SBDART.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation