1985
DOI: 10.1029/jd090id01p02365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol size distributions in air masses advecting off the east coast of the United States

Abstract: Accurate measurements of the size distribution of atmospheric aerosols in the size (radius) range from 0.006 to 2.5 #m made from a ship within 300 km of the east coast of the United States are presented. As air advects from land to sea, there is a rather rapid decay of particles smaller than 0.05 #m during the first day or so. After this initial decay of small particles the size distribution was often found to remain remarkably stable for hours. Significant changes in the size distribution were often associate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
58
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
11
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower September aerosol concentrations in both cases are a product of 1) increased wet deposition during August and September when cloud and precipitation were prevalent compared with July for which no precipitation was recorded, 2) reduced DMS fluxes in the Arctic (Lana et al, 2011) and 3) the minimal anthropogenic influence as represented by the lowest mean rBC concentrations (Figure 1). The 80-200 nm mode in the August lower-rBC distribution, seen elsewhere in the Arctic summer, suggests the addition of sulfate to the cloud activated particles via aqueous-phase oxidation of SO 2 (Heintzenberg and Leck, 1994;Heintzenberg and Leck, 2012;Hoppel, Fitzgerald, and Larson, 1985). The lower-rBC distributions of JJA were input to the aerosol-cloud parcel model to estimate credible CDNC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower September aerosol concentrations in both cases are a product of 1) increased wet deposition during August and September when cloud and precipitation were prevalent compared with July for which no precipitation was recorded, 2) reduced DMS fluxes in the Arctic (Lana et al, 2011) and 3) the minimal anthropogenic influence as represented by the lowest mean rBC concentrations (Figure 1). The 80-200 nm mode in the August lower-rBC distribution, seen elsewhere in the Arctic summer, suggests the addition of sulfate to the cloud activated particles via aqueous-phase oxidation of SO 2 (Heintzenberg and Leck, 1994;Heintzenberg and Leck, 2012;Hoppel, Fitzgerald, and Larson, 1985). The lower-rBC distributions of JJA were input to the aerosol-cloud parcel model to estimate credible CDNC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bi-modal nature of the aerosol columnar volume size distribution may be due to different sources of aerosols such as combination of two air masses with different aerosol origin (Hoppel et al, 1985), generation of new fine particles in the air by the process of heterogeneous nucleation or by homogeneous hetero-molecular nucleation and growth of larger particles by condensation of gasphase reaction products (Singh et al, 2004). Results are given in Fig.…”
Section: Aerosol Columnar Volume Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Data collected with optical particle counters show modes with mass mean diameters of about 8 pm and standard deviations of 1.9 both for continental and urban aerosols (Willeke and Whitby, 1975;Willeke and Brockman, 1977). Samples measured in more remote areas or over the ocean usually give smaller median diameters (Hoppel et al, 1985;Patterson et al, 1980). The smallest mass median diameter of 2.58 pm with a narrow distribution (a, = 1.6) was found for sea-spray aerosol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%