Aerosols generated by releases of pressurized powders and solutions in static air

Sutter, S.L.

doi:10.2172/5761994

Cited by 9 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An extensive experimental program was conducted at PNL to measure aerosol generation during these types of releases (Sutter 1983). In these experiments, powders and liquids were pressurized at up to 1000 psi and released quickly through a rupture disk.…”

Section: P^vmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Initial concepts on energetics and mass releases during nonnuclear explosive events in fuel cycle facilities

Halverson¹,

Mishima²

1986

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although the listing that follows represents the majority of documents cited m NRC publications, it is not intended to be exhaustive.Referenced documents available for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Public Docu ment Room include NRC correspondence and internal NRC memoranda; NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement bulletins, circulars, information notices, inspection and investigation notices; Licensee Event Reports; vendor reports and correspondence; Commission papers; and applicant and licensee documents and correspondence.The following documents in the NUREG series are available for purchase from the GPO Sales Program: formal NRC staff and contractor reports, NRC-sponsored conference proceedings, and NRC booklets and brochures. Also available are Regulatory Guides, NRC regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances. Documents available from the DISCLAIMERThis report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the ^ --•"»nt or anv agency thereof. and opinions of authors c&i^ivo»~ United States Government or any agency thereof. In the absence of methods for specifically estimating the mass releases from slow chemical explosions, the methods described above for fast chemical explosions can be applied. However, great care must be used when choosing the parameters to define the event.For explosive events where the definition of parameters that describe the mass airborne release characteristics is limited, a "bounding" expression for

show abstract

Section: P^vmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The location of the rupture, relative to the powder level, is probably not an important factor because of the almost instantaneous expansion of the bulk powder that occurs where the container ruptures and the confining pressure is lost. The experiments mentioned above (Sutter 1983) were performed with the rupture occurring above the powder level.…”

Section: P^vmentioning

confidence: 99%

Initial concepts on energetics and mass releases during nonnuclear explosive events in fuel cycle facilities

Halverson¹,

Mishima²

1986

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Credit is also not taken for the reduction in ARF as oxide mass is increased. Table 1 of Sutter (1983) shows a reduction in ARF from 0.036 (for the experiment involving 100 g) to 0.02 (for the experiment involving 350 g).…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

“…This should decrease the respirable fraction. The experiments in Sutter (1983) show that the ARF decreases a factor of 1.8 as the mass increases by a factor of 3.5, from 100 g to 350 g. The ratio of 2,500 to 350 is 7, so the ARF should decrease by about a factor of 4 (if the effect is linear) due to the much larger mass. The combination of lower ARF and RF coupled with the larger mass is judged to give the same respirable release as from the venting 700 g of corrosion products.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Calculation note for Consequences of a fire in the sorting and repackaging glovebox in room 636 of bldg 2736-ZB Plutonium Finishing Plant

Johnson¹

1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Investigation of the Transfer Rate of Radioactive Materials in a Hydrogen Explosion Accident at a Reprocessing Plant

Tamauchi¹,

Kodama²,

Sato³

et al. 2022

Nuclear Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aerosols generated by releases of pressurized powders and solutions in static air

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Initial concepts on energetics and mass releases during nonnuclear explosive events in fuel cycle facilities

Initial concepts on energetics and mass releases during nonnuclear explosive events in fuel cycle facilities

Calculation note for Consequences of a fire in the sorting and repackaging glovebox in room 636 of bldg 2736-ZB Plutonium Finishing Plant

Investigation of the Transfer Rate of Radioactive Materials in a Hydrogen Explosion Accident at a Reprocessing Plant

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About