2016
DOI: 10.7249/wr1122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerospace Concept Exploration System: Architecture and Methods for an Air Vehicle Design Tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the ideal goal is to obtain globally optimal solutions (i.e., the best possible design for a given aircraft objective function); yet global optima are generally not guaranteed even if a gradient method converges. 3 As an example of a gradient-based tool, the Aircraft Concept Exploration System (ACES) developed here at RAND by Xu et al (2016) uses sequential quadratic programming (SQP), an approximate gradient technique, to optimize aircraft designs.…”
Section: Uav Design Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the ideal goal is to obtain globally optimal solutions (i.e., the best possible design for a given aircraft objective function); yet global optima are generally not guaranteed even if a gradient method converges. 3 As an example of a gradient-based tool, the Aircraft Concept Exploration System (ACES) developed here at RAND by Xu et al (2016) uses sequential quadratic programming (SQP), an approximate gradient technique, to optimize aircraft designs.…”
Section: Uav Design Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACES, by comparison, takes approximately 5 minutes to solve a similarly sized problem, which is a difference of two orders of magnitude. We note, however, that ACES is a higher-fidelity model that allows for more general aircraft design optimization and thus in many cases warrants the longer computation times (Xu et al, 2016). RUDOFF is specifically designed for small UAV analyses and makes several assumptions regarding aircraft configuration to simplify the model implementation.…”
Section: Comparing Computational Performance With Acesmentioning
confidence: 99%